Goldstein v Sanders

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1915
Date1915
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Ng Hui Lip & Co; Teo Chwee Geok
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Perfect Pies Ltd ((in Receivership)) v Pearse Farrell and Another
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 6 November 2015
    ...that the proposed assignee will remedy any breaches of covenant to repair that are anything more than minimal: Goldstein v. Sanders [1915] 1 Ch 549. Furthermore, it may be reasonable for a landlord to demand that the assignee and its guarantor covenant to a strict timetable for repairs and ......
  • Orlando Investments Ltd (Appellant (Plaintiff) v Grosvenor Estate Belgravia (Respondent
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 April 1989
    ...as nearly two years elapsed before the second application was made for the repairs to be done. It was quite different from the case of Goldstein v. Sanders [1915] 1 Ch.549, where the state of things as to repairs was 'little short of being outrageous'." 37 In Goldstein v. Sanders, a decisio......
  • Teo Chwee Geok v Ng Hui Lip & Co
    • Singapore
    • Federal Court (Singapore)
    • 3 February 1967
    ...of which the plaintiff was the chief tenant. Had they been assignees of the plaintiff, the principle established by Goldstein v Sanders [1915] 1 Ch 549 might have applied so as to make such a covenant run with the land so as to bind Maynard`s as that case decided that such a covenant binds ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT