Goode v Martin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2001
Year2001
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
48 cases
  • Mastercard Inc. & Others v Deutsche Bahn AG & Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 April 2017
    ...this question was given by Colman J in BP Plc v Aon Ltd [2006] 1 Lloyds Rep 549, 558 where he said: '52. At first instance in Goode v Martin [2001] 3 All ER 562 I considered the purpose of section 35(5) in the following passage: 'Whether one factual basis is 'substantially the same' as anot......
  • Society of Lloyd's v Henderson and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 July 2007
    ... ... That is why this court has said that the basic test is whether the plea introduces new facts: Goode v Martin [2002] 1 WLR 1828 at paragraph 42 ... 54 The additional possibility that the new facts are substantially the same as those ... ...
  • Charles Church Developments Ltd v Stent Foundations Ltd and Peter Dann Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • Invalid date
    ...justly, as we are adjured to do by the CPR. I would therefore permit the amendment and allow the appeal.” 33 Thus, it can be seen that in Goode v Martin the Court of Appeal reached its decision on the basis of an expanded version of CPR r 17.4(2). I shall refer to the expanded version of th......
  • Madelene Nolan & Others v Tui Uk Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 16 October 2013
    ... ... 9 The wording of CPR 17.4 must now be read subject to the observations of the Court of Appeal in Goode v Martin [2002] 1 WLR 1828 ... In that case it was held that, in order to render the rule compliant with Article 6 of the European Convention on ... ...
  • Get Started for Free