Goodwin v Robarts

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtExchequer Division
Year1875
Date1875

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Pan-Electric Industries Ltd (in liquidation) v Sim Lim Finance Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 31 Mayo 1993
    ...like negotiable instruments. The absence of any such evidence of mercantile usage not only distinguishes this case from Goodwin v Robarts LR 10 Ex 76; 1 App Cas 476, but renders the reasoning on which that case was decided wholly inapplicable to the case now before us, and makes it unnecess......
  • Re Shields' Estate
    • Ireland
    • Land Commission (Ireland)
    • 28 Noviembre 1900
    ...De Gex F. & J. 338. Ex parte Coe 3 DeG. F. & J. 335. Ex parte WilsonENR 1 Atk. 217. Foley v. Hill 2 H. L. Cas. 28. Goodwin v. RobartsELR L.R. 10 Ex. 337,351. Guinness' Case 1 Ir. Jur. 359. Hayden v. CarrollENR 2 Ridg. 545. Hayden v. Carroll 3 Ridg. P. C. 545. In re Guinness 1 Ir. Jur. 359. ......
  • Toll Logistics (nz) Limited v Andrew John Mckay and John Joseph Cregten Coa
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 16 Mayo 2011
    ...AC 368 (HL) at 414. Winchester v Fleming [1938] 1 QB 259. Edie v East India Co (1761) 2 Burr 1216, 97 ER 797 (KB). Goodwin v Robarts (1875) LR 10 Ex 337 Teheran-Europe Co Ltd v S T Belton (Tractors) Ltd [1968] 2 QB 53; aff’d in part [1968] 2 QB 545 (CA). and said it was open for any court t......
  • Wah Tat Bank Ltd and Others v Chan Cheng Kum and Others
    • Singapore
    • Federal Court (Singapore)
    • 7 Julio 1967
    ...or persons ... The effect of this usage or custom in relation to the common law is thus described by Cockburn CJ in Goodwin v Robarts (1875) LR 10 Exch 337 at p 352: ... bills of lading may also be referred to as an instance of how general mercantile usage may give effect to a writing which......
  • Get Started for Free