Governors of Stewart's Educational Trust v School Boards of Logierait and Weem

JurisdictionScotland
CourtCourt of Session
Judgment Date18 October 1898
Docket NumberNo. 1.
Date18 October 1898
Governors of Stewart's Educational Trust
and
School Boards of Logierait and Weem.

Lord President, Lord Adam, Lord Kinnear.

No. 1.
Court of Session
1st Division

Charitable and Educational Trusts—Alteration of Scheme under Educational Endowments Act, 1882 (45 and 46 Vict. cap. 59)—Amendment to alterations proposed in petition.—

In an educational trust administered under a scheme settled by the Educational Endowments Commissioners, the parishes of A, B, and C had an interest. In consequence of an alteration in the boundaries of the parish of A, a majority of the governors were of opinion that A had no longer right to the benefit of the trust. On the suggestion of the Scotch Education Department a compromise was agreed to by the governors, among whom were representatives of the parishes of A, B, and C, by which A was allowed to retain a certain benefit, and a petition was, with consent of the Department, presented to the Court for an alteration of the existing scheme in terms of the compromise.

B and C proposed an amendment to the scheme embodied in the petition to the effect of excluding A from the benefit of the trust.

The Court refused to entertain B and C's amendment, as being outwith the subject-matter submitted to the Court by the petition.

Observations on the power of the Court to entertain amendments to a proposed scheme.

The Governors of Stewart's Educational Trust presented a petition craving the Court to alter certain provisions of a scheme framed by the Educational Endowments Commissioners for the administration of the trust, power to do so being given to the Court by section 21 of the scheme, upon application made with consent of the Scotch Education Department. The petition was presented with the consent of the Scotch Education Department.

The endowment was founded by Daniel Stewart in 1814. He bequeathed £1200 for the purchase of land and the erection of a school in the district of Strathtay, Perthshire, and £2000 to maintain and support the school, and directed that free education should there be given to poor children residing ‘within the parishes of Logierait, Weem, and Moulin, in the district of Strathtay, presbytery of Dunkeld,’ who should be preferred, and thereafter to poor children ‘from any of the other neighbouring parishes in the said district of Strathtay and presbytery of Dunkeld, lying next and adjacent to the three parishes above named.’

The trustees acquired lands lying partly in the parish of Logierait, and partly in the parish of Dull, and erected a school on that part of the lands which lay within the parish of Logierait. Portions of the parishes of Logierait, Weem...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
146 cases
  • The Queen (on the application of Raza Ali) v Police Appeals Tribunal
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • March 18, 2022
  • Adrian Nation v DPP and Attorney General of Jamaica
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • July 15, 2011
    ...of the Court's civil jurisdiction. Section 11 of the Judicature (Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, setting out restrictions on appeal, at 11 ( 1) (f) (1) makes an exception ‘where the liberty of the subject…is concerned.’ A refusal of an application for bail does not prevent a further or further......
  • Price v. H. Lundbeck A/S
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2018
    ...mso-ansi-font-size:11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:#1F1F1F; mso-font-width:101%;} @list font-family:"Courier New"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Courier New"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-font......
  • Edel Marie Magee v John Wade Crocker
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • July 5, 2024
    ... ... Defendants and Camelot Trust Corporation Limited Third Party ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
57 firm's commentaries
  • Maine Regulation of Public Utilities: Second Edition
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 28, 2018
    ...to a proceeding the information denied the general public. 282 Id. § 1311-A(1)(F) (2010). 283 Id. § 1311-A(1)(E) (2010). 284 Id. § 1311-A(1)(F)(1) (2010). Adjudicatory Proceedings66 4. Appeals of Hearing Examiner Rulings Under Chapter 110 of the Commission’s rules, the hearing examiner has ......
  • Latest Developments On Injunctive Relief For Infringement Of FRAND Encumbered SEPs
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • August 15, 2013
    ...patent subject only to considering the effect of such order on the statutory public interest factors set forth in Section 337(d)(1), (e)(1), (f)(1) and (g)(1): “the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive......
  • Employer Wellness Programs: What Financial Incentives Are Permitted Under The Law?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • August 6, 2013
    ...[3] Kaiser Family Foundation, Employer Health Benefits 2012 Annual Survey, 177-88 (2012) [4] Id. at 185. [5] 26 C.F.R.. § 54.9802-1(f)(1); 29 C.F.R. §. 2590.702(f)(1); 45 C.F.R [6] 26 C.F.R.. § 54.9802-1(f)(2); 29 C.F.R. §. 2590.702(f)(2); 45 C.F.R §146.121(f)(2). [7] 26 C.F.R.. § 54.9802-1......
  • Foreign Corporate Practices Act: Is Your Company Prepared For The New Era Of Increased Enforcement?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • May 23, 2011
    ...3 5 WCR 62 (1/29/10). 4 15 U.S.C. § § 78dd-1 et seq. 5 Id. 6 15 U.S.C. § § 78dd-1(F)(1)(A), 78dd-2(H)(1)(A), 7 See SEC press release, SEC Charges Alcatel-Lucent with FCPA Violations, available at http://sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-258.htm. 8 15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)(A). 9 15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2......
  • Get Started for Free
120 books & journal articles
  • Need-To-Know Divorce Tax Law for Legal Assistance Officers
    • United States
    • Military Law Review No. 177, December 2003
    • December 1, 2003
    ...old residence and who jointly consented to the requirements of I.R.C. § 1034(g).335 The Tax Court also cited Treasury Regulations § 1.1034-1(f)(1),336 the instructions for IRS Form 2119337 and IRS Publication 523, Tax Information on Selling Your Home,338 to support its conclusion.I.R.C. § 1......
  • Compulsory Patent Licensing in the Time of COVID-19: Views from the United States, Canada, and Europe
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Landslide No. 13-2, November 2020
    • November 1, 2020
    ...388 (2006). 16. Spansion, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 629 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2010). 17. Id. at 1358. 18. See 19 U.S.C. § 1337(d)(1), (e)(1), (f)(1). 19. Certain Recombinant Factor VIII Prods., Inv. No. 337-TA-956 (USITC filed Apr. 16, 2015). 20. Certain Recombinant Factor VIII Products; D......
  • Social Media and Online Persecution
    • United States
    • Georgetown Immigration Law Journal No. 35-3, April 2021
    • April 1, 2021
    ...distinct public and private spheres). 302. Compare Final Rule, supra note 8, at 80,281, 80,330–31, 80,386, 80,395 (adding 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.1 (f)(1), (2) and 1208.1(f)(1), (2) to designate “interpersonal animus or retribution” as a reason that would generally not satisfy the nexus element), w......
  • FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 58-3, July 2021
    • July 1, 2021
    ...(g)(1) (for issuers), 78dd-2(a)(3), (i)(1) (for domestic concerns), 78dd-3(a)(3) (for persons within U.S. territory). 79. Id. § 78dd-1(f)(1)(A). See infra Part III.A.5 (discussing foreign off‌icials). 1022 AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW [Vol. 58:1011 for foreign political off‌ice80 (6) to inf......
  • Get Started for Free
15 forms
351 provisions
  • The Southampton to London Pipeline Development Consent Order 2020
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 1, 2020
    ...9ZLand Plans – Sheet 47 1661, 1663, 1664, 1665, 1666, 1667, 1668, 1676, 1682, 1684, 1685, 1687, 1689 Work No. 1F 1680, 1681, 1692 Work Nos. 1F, 1G and Work Nos. 1F and 5L 1700, 1701, 1712 Work Nos. 1F and 1G 1702, 1704, 1708, 1710, 1715, 1723, 1724, 1725, 1726, 1728, 1729, 1733, 1736, 1747,......
  • The Independent Police Complaints Commission (Immigration and Asylum Enforcement Functions) Regulations 2008
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 1, 2008
    ...appropriate authority”. (4) In subsection (1)(e)12omit “and also of police practice in relation to other matters,”. (5) Omit subsections (1)(f), (1)(g) and (6) For subsection (3)14, substitute— SCH-1.3 “3 In carrying out its functions under subsection (1)(d) and (e) the Commission shall onl......
  • The A160/A180 (Port of Immingham Improvement) Development Consent Order 2015
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 1, 2015
    ...to enable the use of the existing access track between the A160, Ryehill Farm and A1077 Ulceby Road. Work No. 1 1/1b, 1/1c, 1/1d, 1/1e, 1/1f, 1/1h, 1/1i, 1/1j, 1/1k, 1/1m, 1/1u, 1/1v, 1/1w, 1/1x, 1/1z, 1/1af, 1/1ag, 1/1ai, 1/1aj, 1/2a, 1/3a, 1/3c, 1/3d, 1/3e, Required to provide constructio......
  • Liverpool Corporation Act 1921
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 1, 1921
    ...of this subsc~ct i 011 I I a ve 1 ) e ~ nc o111 plied wit It. LANDS. C:\istin:: lI'"l "I I ,It 011( i l l . it, votititittr \t 1 1 '11~1 1f1*1( l ' 1 .i lietl in tlic nie nianner a s capital inomys received under tlint arc’ tLj’plicnb!c or in sc~cliother manncr ;LC; may be approved l y the ......
  • Get Started for Free