Governors of Stewart's Educational Trust v School Boards of Logierait and Weem

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date18 October 1898
Date18 October 1898
Docket NumberNo. 1.
CourtCourt of Session
Court of Session
1st Division

Lord President, Lord Adam, Lord Kinnear.

No. 1.
Governors of Stewart's Educational Trust
and
School Boards of Logierait and Weem.

Charitable and Educational TrustsAlteration of Scheme under Educational Endowments Act, 1882 (45 and 46 Vict. cap. 59)Amendment to alterations proposed in petition.

In an educational trust administered under a scheme settled by the Educational Endowments Commissioners, the parishes of A, B, and C had an interest. In consequence of an alteration in the boundaries of the parish of A, a majority of the governors were of opinion that A had no longer right to the benefit of the trust. On the suggestion of the Scotch Education Department a compromise was agreed to by the governors, among whom were representatives of the parishes of A, B, and C, by which A was allowed to retain a certain benefit, and a petition was, with consent of the Department, presented to the Court for an alteration of the existing scheme in terms of the compromise.

B and C proposed an amendment to the scheme embodied in the petition to the effect of excluding A from the benefit of the trust.

The Court refused to entertain B and C's amendment, as being outwith the subject-matter submitted to the Court by the petition.

Observations on the power of the Court to entertain amendments to a proposed scheme.

The Governors of Stewart's Educational Trust presented a petition craving the Court to alter certain provisions of a scheme framed by the Educational Endowments Commissioners for the administration of the trust, power to do so being given to the Court by section 21 of the scheme, upon application made with consent of the Scotch Education Department. The petition was presented with the consent of the Scotch Education Department.

The endowment was founded by Daniel Stewart in 1814. He bequeathed 1200 for the purchase of land and the erection of a school in the district of Strathtay, Perthshire, and 2000 to maintain and support the school, and directed that free education should there be given to poor children residing within the parishes of Logierait, Weem, and Moulin, in the district of Strathtay, presbytery of Dunkeld, who should be preferred, and thereafter to poor children from any of the other neighbouring parishes in the said district of Strathtay and presbytery of Dunkeld, lying next and adjacent to the three parishes above named.

The trustees acquired lands lying partly in the parish of Logierait, and partly in the parish of Dull, and erected a school on that part of the lands which lay within the parish of Logierait. Portions of the parishes of Logierait, Weem, and Dull, were a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
182 cases
  • Adrian Nation v DPP and Attorney General of Jamaica
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • July 15, 2011
    ...of the Court's civil jurisdiction. Section 11 of the Judicature (Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, setting out restrictions on appeal, at 11 ( 1) (f) (1) makes an exception ‘where the liberty of the subject…is concerned.’ A refusal of an application for bail does not prevent a further or further......
  • Price v. H. Lundbeck A/S, 2018 ONSC 4333
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2018
    ...mso-ansi-font-size:11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:#1F1F1F; mso-font-width:101%;} @list font-family:"Courier New"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Courier New"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-font......
  • Clearswift Ltd v Glasswall (IP) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • September 28, 2018
    ...the file type specification [1f] and additional rules constraining the values and/or ranges that content and parameters can take on ANALYSIS [ 1f1] determining a purported predetermined data file type of each part [1g] parsing the content data of each part in accordance with the rules assoc......
  • Petition Of Her Majesty's Advocate Against Mohammed Younas And Farzana Ashraf
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • February 8, 2018
    ...to a Confiscation Order made by Lord Pentland on 11 November 2014 (“the Confiscation Order”) and that so as to exclude the property at Flat 1f1, 82 Polwarth Gardens, Edinburgh, EH11 1LJ (“the property”) so that it cannot be 2 disposed of by the administrator. Due to the lengthy and complex ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
105 firm's commentaries
  • Maine Regulation of Public Utilities: Second Edition
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 28, 2018
    ...to a proceeding the information denied the general public. 282 Id. § 1311-A(1)(F) (2010). 283 Id. § 1311-A(1)(E) (2010). 284 Id. § 1311-A(1)(F)(1) (2010). Adjudicatory Proceedings66 4. Appeals of Hearing Examiner Rulings Under Chapter 110 of the Commission’s rules, the hearing examiner has ......
  • Latest Developments On Injunctive Relief For Infringement Of FRAND Encumbered SEPs
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • August 15, 2013
    ...patent subject only to considering the effect of such order on the statutory public interest factors set forth in Section 337(d)(1), (e)(1), (f)(1) and (g)(1): “the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive......
  • Foreign Individuals Holding U.S. Real Property, or Left Holding the Bag?
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • February 21, 2023
    ...thereto, including depreciation. The net income would then be taxable at the corporate tax rate. [lvi] IRC Sec. 884. [lvii] Reg. Sec. 1.884-1(f)(1). [lviii] But we are talking about real property, aren’t we?...
  • Withholding Taxes: Deferred Comp and Services Overseas
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • September 6, 2023
    ...[xli] Reg. Sec. 31.3121(v)(2)-1(b)(4)(iii). [xlii] In accordance with Reg. Sec. 31.3121(v)(2)-1(e). Reg. Sec. 31.3121(v)(2)-1(f)(1). [xliii] IRC Section 861(a)(3); Reg. Sec. 1.861-4(a)(1). [xliv] IRC Section 862(a)(3). [xlv] Reg. Sec. 1.861-4(b)(2)(ii)(E). [xlvi] Reg. Sec. 1.861-4(b)(2)(ii)......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
198 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 7
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Zalma on Property and Casualty Insurance
    • Invalid date
    ...which it is a part, because its last phrase (“if the loss would otherwise be covered under this policy”) requires us to disregard paragraphs 1(f), 1(g), and 1(h) of the policy. Clearly, removing the 22 exclusions in those paragraphs would create mold coverage, but it would also create a dif......
  • The Legal Assistance Attorney's Guide to Immigration and Naturalization
    • United States
    • Military Law Review No. 177, December 2003
    • December 1, 2003
    ...office in the U.S. having jurisdiction over the self-petitioners place of residence in the United States. Id. § 204.1(e)(2). 157. Id. § 204.1(f)(1), (2)(v). A self-petitioner filing based on physical abuse must submit evidence of abuse which may include reports and affidavits from police, j......
  • International and U.S. obligation toward stowaway asylum seekers.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 140 No. 1, November 1991
    • November 1, 1991
    ...hearing before an immigration judge, if asylum is denied at the district director level. To implement these changes, 8 C.F.R. Section 253.1(F)(1) should be amended to read: "(1) If the alien is on a vessel or other conveyance, she shall be promptly removed from the conveyance." Removal from......
  • Social Media and Online Persecution
    • United States
    • Georgetown Immigration Law Journal No. 35-3, April 2021
    • April 1, 2021
    ...distinct public and private spheres). 302. Compare Final Rule, supra note 8, at 80,281, 80,330–31, 80,386, 80,395 (adding 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.1 (f)(1), (2) and 1208.1(f)(1), (2) to designate “interpersonal animus or retribution” as a reason that would generally not satisfy the nexus element), w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 forms
  • Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income for a Bank with Domestic and Foreign Offices
    • United States
    • United States Forms Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
    • Invalid date
    ...that are in compliance with their modified terms (sum of Memorandum items 1.a.(1) through 1.f)....................................... HK25 M.1. f.(1) M.1. f.(3) M.1. f.(4)(a) M.1. f.(4)(b) M.1. f.(4)(c) M.1. g. 1. For “large institutions” and “highly complex institutions,” as defined for de......
  • Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income for a Bank with Domestic Offices Only and Total Assets Less than $5 Billion
    • United States
    • United States Forms Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
    • Invalid date
    ...loans restructured in troubled debt restructurings that are in compliance with their modified terms (sum of Memorandum items 1.a through 1.f): (1) Loans secured by farmland .................................................. (2) and (3) Not applicable (4) Loans to individuals for household, ......
  • Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income for a Bank with Domestic and Foreign Offices
    • United States
    • United States Forms Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
    • Invalid date
    ...that are in compliance with their modified terms (sum of Memorandum items 1.a.(1) through 1.f)....................................... HK25 M.1. f.(1) M.1. f.(3) M.1. f.(4)(a) M.1. f.(4)(b) M.1. f.(4)(c) M.1. g. 1. For “large institutions” and “highly complex institutions,” as defined for de......
  • Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income for a Bank with Domestic and Foreign Offices
    • United States
    • United States Forms Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
    • Invalid date
    ...that are in compliance with their modified terms (sum of Memorandum items 1.a.(1) through 1.f)....................................... HK25 M.1. f.(1) M.1. f.(3) M.1. f.(4)(a) M.1. f.(4)(b) M.1. f.(4)(c) M.1. g. 1. For “large institutions” and “highly complex institutions,” as defined for de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
669 provisions
  • MO Register Vol. 36 No. 10. (Pages 1217-1440)
    • United States
    • Missouri Register
    • January 1, 2011
    ...The site is assessed within and immediately below the UST system excavation zone to ensure compliance with the requirements in paragraphs (1)(F)1.-5. of this rule. The site assessment also establishes the number and positioning of monitoring wells or devices that will detect releases from a......
  • IL Register Vol. 42 Issue 27. Issue 27 - July 06, 2018 - Pages 12,369-13,468
    • United States
    • Illinois Register
    • January 1, 2018
    ...the effective date of the requirements of this Section (April 9, 1997 or October 9, 1997 for MSWLF units meeting the conditions of Sec. 258.1(f)(1)), whichever is later.". The Board has instead inserted the date on which these amendments are to be filed and become effective in 3) After the ......
  • Georgia Monthly Bulletin, 2019-09, September 2019
    • United States
    • Georgia Register
    • Invalid date
    ... ... not refer to training functions or educational programs ... 2. Additive ... (i) "Food ... as a health care facility, hotel, motel, school, recreational camp, or prison ... 82. "Primal ... trust with a high level of honesty, accuracy, and ... ...
  • Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 1, 2005
    ...person, or (b) by an employee of his. (2) The order may provide— (a) that the power of the relevant authority to make the arrangements is subj...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT