Graham v Graham's Trustees
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Judgment Date | 15 October 1901 |
| Date | 15 October 1901 |
| Docket Number | No. 1. |
| Court | Court of Session |
Lord President, Lord M'Laren, Lord Adam, Lord Kinnear.
Process—Mandatary—Soldier on Foreign Service.—
Circumstances in which the Court refused to ordain the pursuer of an action who was a soldier on foreign service to sist a mandatary.
Peter Macpherson Graham, gunner in the 15th Company of the Royal Artillery, and on service with the Northern Field Force in China, raised an action in the Sheriff Court at Glasgow against the trustees under the trust-disposition and settlement of his father, Alexander Graham, formerly a wine and spirit merchant in Glasgow, who had died domiciled in Scotland, and leaving estate situated exclusively in Scotland.
The action concluded for production of an account by the trustees of their intromissions with the moveable estate of the deceased, and for payment of the amount which should be ascertained as the pursuer's share of the estate.
The defenders admitted that the pursuer was entitled to one-sixth of the legitim fund, if any, under a provision of the settlement by which the trustees were directed to pay him his legitim.
In the inventory lodged by the trustees, and in a statement furnished by their agent to the pursuer, the free moveable estate was brought out at £845, 17s. 1d., and the legitim fund at one-half of this sum, £422, 18s. 6d., one-sixth share of which would amount to £70, 9s. 9d. But in their answers to the pursuer's condescendence the defenders stated that this estimate of the moveable estate was inaccurate, as it was based on the assumption that the goodwill of certain licensed premises of which the deceased was tenant, and which formed the chief asset, was moveable. They averred ‘that there was no free estate available apart from the goodwill of the businesses for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fairford First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), (1998) 156 F.T.R. 1 (TD)
...beyond merely land and that the Fairford First Nation had no capacity or authority to conclude such negotiations or agreements"? Para: 174 4.F.1. Plaintiffs' Position Para: 174 4.F.2. Facts Para: 175 4.F.3. The Crown's Duty Para: 183 4.F.4. Withholding of information by Canada Para: 187 4.G......
-
R. v. Heikel et al. (No. 3), (1990) 110 A.R. 161 (QB)
...[en.1986. c. 35. s. 14] 188(4)(e.1) [re-en. R.S.C. 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 10] 178.15(4)(c) [re-en. 1986 c. 35. s. 14] 188(4)(f.1) [en. R.S.C. 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 10] 178.15(4)(c.1) 188(4)(d) 178.15(4)(c.2) 178.15(4)(d) 188(4)(e) 178.15(4)(e) 188(4)(f) 178.15(4)(f) 188(4)(g) 178......
-
Kennedy v Judge Nolan & DPP
...or (b) quash the decision of the trial court, in which case the trial of the accused may proceed as if the charge had never been dismissed. 7 4F(1) At any time after the accused is sent forward for trial, the prosecutor or the accused may apply to the trial court for an order requiring a pe......
- Candey Ltd v Tonstate Group Ltd
-
When Does a Foreign Law Compel a U.S. Employer to Discriminate Against U.S. Expatriates?: A Modest Proposal for Reform
...2 and 3 at pp. 3-4 of ADEA Policy Guidance.[51] The EEOC’s ADEA Policy Guidance in turn provides: A critical element of a successful sec. 4(f)(1) "foreign laws" defense is proof by the United States employer, or a corporation controlled by such employer, that compliance with the ADEA would ......
-
Brief For Amici Curiea Economists In Support Of Appellees/Cross-Appellants And Affirmance
...Payers?,” California Foundation for Commerce and Education (2007), available at http://www.cornerstone.com/files/CaseStudy/9bc04cf2-dd57-4f1d-ab3c-e5e0d5e7c96e/Presentation/CaseStudyFile/4796ca54-3a8a-4676-a61c-4c4b9f5a5272/Kessler_CFCE_Cost_Shift_Study%206-6-07.pdf ..............................
-
False Claims Act Recent Developments
...the law" in Alison Engine I, including that intent and materiality standard. S. Rep. No. 10, 111th Cong., 1st Sess. 10 (2009). Under Section 4(f)(1) of FERA, the legislation "took effect as if enacted on June 7, 2008," two days before the Allison Engine I opinion was issued, and would apply......
-
A Confidential Consultation?
...version: '0' , handler: '//fbapps.jdsupra.com/statistics/pixel?partnerID=dc4a1c64-176f-4a9f-913d-afd8f74f746f&file_unique_id=408a7d4d-c43d-4f1d-951e-3db8fc529a31&profile_id=15516&type=5&' // Public , pageview: function (data) { if (data === undefined) { data = this._curpage(); } else if (ty......
-
Ten Troubles with Title VII and Trait Discrimination Plus One Simple Solution (A totality of the Circumstances Framework)
...that RFOA is one of five affirmative defenses articulated under the ADEA). 296 Id . at 2345 (explaining that unlike Title VII, however, § 4(f)(1) of the ADEA contains language that significantly narrows its coverage by permitting any “otherwise prohibited” action “where the differentiation ......
-
Summary judgment
...regulations provide that the generalized costs of employing older workers does not qualify as a reasonable factor other than age under ADEA §4(f)(1). 29 C.F.R. §1625.7(f). Thus, the cost of insurance for older workers cannot provide an economic justiication for terminating an older worker, ......
-
The law
...plainti൵s. For disparate impact claims, the statutory defense for ADEA claims is the reasonable factor other than age (RFOA) defense in ADEA§4(f)(1), not the business necessity defense available in Title VII claims. The Supreme Court held in Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs. , 557 U.S. 167, 174 (200......
-
Parochial procedure.
...[listing four options]; or (3) by other means not prohibited by international agreement, as the court orders. (307) While the new Rule 4(f)(1) increased awareness of the Service Convention, the new Rule 4(f)(3) introduced a safety valve that the Ninth Circuit has interpreted as a broad stan......
-
Limitation on Use of Appropriated Funds to Influence Certain Federal Contracting and Financial Transactions
...319(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1989, 103 Stat. 750; amended Pub. L. 101-512, title III, Sec. 320, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1977; Pub. L. 103-272, Sec. 4(f)(1)(F), July 1994, 108 Stat. 1362; Pub. L. 104-65, Sec. 10, Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 700; Pub. L. 104-66, title III, Sec. 3001(b), Dec. 21, 1995, 10......
-
Arbitrage Rebate, Yield Reduction and Penalty in Lieu of Arbitrage Rebate
...administrative costs taken into account in computing the rebate amount under these special rules. Line 27. Under Regulations section 1.148-4(f)(1), fees properly allocable to Instructions for Form 8038-T (Rev. 10-2021) payments for a qualified guarantee for an issue are treated as additiona......
-
Disclosure Statement
...original tax return. Keep a copy for your records. You may be able to file Form 8275 with an amended return. See Regulations sections 1.6662-4(f)(1) and 1.6664-2(c)(3) for more To make adequate disclosure for items reported by a pass-though entity, you must complete and file a separate Form......
-
Regulation Disclosure Statement
...tax return. Keep a copy for your records. You may also be able to file Forms 8275-R with an amended return. See Regulations sections 1.6662-4(f)(1) and 1.6664-2(c)(3) for more To make adequate disclosure for items reported by a pass-through entity, you must complete and file a separate Form......
- Georgia Monthly Bulletin, 2022-03, March 2022 v2a
- New Jersey Register, Volume 46, Issue 09, May 5, 2014
-
Protection of Freedoms Act 2012
...are to be read accordingly) , and (b) the power of the Secretary of State under paragraph 4D(4) (b) , and of a senior officer under paragraph 4F(1) (c) , includes a power to remove areas or places from the (4I) (1) Sub-paragraph (2) applies if any decision of— (a) a senior officer to give, ......
-
Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994
...as mentioned in Sch. 4 para. 16(2) of the amending Act) by 1995 c. 4, s. 19, Sch. 4 Pt. III paras. 10, 16 F339 Words in Sch. 1 para. 4F(1) inserted (29.4.1996 with application in relation to licences taken out after 28.11.1995) by 1996 c. 8, s. 15(2)(a)(4) F340 Sch. 1 para. 4F(2) repealed (......