Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1974
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
43 cases
  • UMCI Ltd v Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 7 August 2006
    ...inspection and equipment may be used to “inspect” documents. It was so held by Walton J in Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd [1975] Ch 185 (“Grant”). Two short passages from the judgment are instructive. At 197, Walton J observed as It is, I think, quite clear that the mere int......
  • Megastar Entertainment Pte Ltd and Another v Odex Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 28 April 2005
    ...within the meaning of s 380 of the CPC. 36 I also found instructive the decision in Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd [1975] Ch 185 where Walton J held at 197 that “the mere interposition of necessity of an instrument for deciphering the information” (such as a tape recorder in......
  • R William Hill Organization Ltd (Claimant) The Horserace Betting Levy Board (Defendant) The Association of British Bookmakers and Others (Interested Parties)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 July 2012
    ...language: see Bennion, Statutory Interpretation, 4th ed (2002), Part XVIII, Section 288. A revealing example is found in Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd [1975] Ch 185, where Walton J had to decide whether a tape recording fell within the expression "document" in the Rules of ......
  • Property Alliance Group Ltd v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 November 2015
    ...from English and other common law countries' courts concerning the recording of conversations. The first two, English, cases are Grant v Southwestern [1975] 1 Ch 185 and Parry v News Group [1990] 141 NLJ 1719 (CA). These cases establish that a record of a non-privileged conversation, whethe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Electronic discovery issues: disclosure requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia.
    • United States
    • Defense Counsel Journal Vol. 65 No. 2, April 1998
    • 1 April 1998
    ...495 (1947). (44.) [1991] 1 W.L.R. 652 (Ch.D.), [1991] 1 All E.R. 901 (Ch.D.). (45.) Grant v. Southwestern and County Properties Ltd., [1975] Ch. 185. (46.) [1991] 1 W.L.R. at 654, [1991] 1 All E.R. at (47.) O. Co. v. M. Co., [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 374, at 351, per Colman J. Formulations of t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT