Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1974 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
44 cases
-
UMCI Ltd v Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Others
...inspection and equipment may be used to “inspect” documents. It was so held by Walton J in Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd [1975] Ch 185 (“Grant”). Two short passages from the judgment are instructive. At 197, Walton J observed as It is, I think, quite clear that the mere int......
-
Megastar Entertainment Pte Ltd and Another v Odex Pte Ltd
...within the meaning of s 380 of the CPC. 36 I also found instructive the decision in Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd [1975] Ch 185 where Walton J held at 197 that “the mere interposition of necessity of an instrument for deciphering the information” (such as a tape recorder in......
-
Victor Chandler International v Commissioners of Customs and Excise and Another
... ... 1113 ; [ 1999 ] 4 All E.R. 705 , H.L.(E.) ... Grant v. Southwestern and County Properties Ltd. [ 1975 ] Ch. 185 ; [ 1974 ... ...
-
Appeal From Glasgow Sheriff Court Stuart Docherty+paul Logan+james Philbin V. The Scottish Ministers
...Interpretation, 4th ed. (2002), Part XVIII, Section 288. A revealing example is found is Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd [1975] Ch. 185, where Walton J had to decide whether a tape recording fell within the expression "document" in the Rules of the Supreme Court. Pointing out......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Electronic discovery issues: disclosure requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia.
...495 (1947). (44.) [1991] 1 W.L.R. 652 (Ch.D.), [1991] 1 All E.R. 901 (Ch.D.). (45.) Grant v. Southwestern and County Properties Ltd., [1975] Ch. 185. (46.) [1991] 1 W.L.R. at 654, [1991] 1 All E.R. at (47.) O. Co. v. M. Co., [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 374, at 351, per Colman J. Formulations of t......