Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1974
Date1974

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
37 cases
  • UMCI Ltd v Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 7 August 2006
    ...inspection and equipment may be used to “inspect” documents. It was so held by Walton J in Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd [1975] Ch 185 (“Grant”). Two short passages from the judgment are instructive. At 197, Walton J observed as It is, I think, quite clear that the mere int......
  • Megastar Entertainment Pte Ltd and Another v Odex Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 28 April 2005
    ...within the meaning of s 380 of the CPC. 36 I also found instructive the decision in Grant v Southwestern and County Properties Ltd [1975] Ch 185 where Walton J held at 197 that “the mere interposition of necessity of an instrument for deciphering the information” (such as a tape recorder in......
  • Derby & Company Ltd v Weldon (No. 9)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Overy. [Reported by EDWARD JACKSON ESQ[1991] 2 All E.R. 890, C.A. Grant v. Southwestern and County Properties Ltd. [1975] Ch. 185; [1974] 3 W.L.R. 221; [1974] 2 All E.R. 465 No additional cases were cited in argument. MOTION By a writ issued on 25 June 1987 and amended, the plaintiffs, Derb......
  • Property Alliance Group Ltd v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 November 2015
    ...from English and other common law countries' courts concerning the recording of conversations. The first two, English, cases are Grant v Southwestern [1975] 1 Ch 185 and Parry v News Group [1990] 141 NLJ 1719 (CA). These cases establish that a record of a non-privileged conversation, whethe......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Electronic discovery issues: disclosure requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia.
    • United States
    • Defense Counsel Journal Vol. 65 No. 2, April 1998
    • 1 April 1998
    ...495 (1947). (44.) [1991] 1 W.L.R. 652 (Ch.D.), [1991] 1 All E.R. 901 (Ch.D.). (45.) Grant v. Southwestern and County Properties Ltd., [1975] Ch. 185. (46.) [1991] 1 W.L.R. at 654, [1991] 1 All E.R. at (47.) O. Co. v. M. Co., [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 374, at 351, per Colman J. Formulations of t......