Gravenor port Replevin v Parker, le Case fuit que un fist Lease a auter per
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
61 cases
-
Chief Commissioner of Police (Victoria), Re Application by
...Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Vict) (2001) 207 CLR 72 at 78 [11], 91 [53]. 71 Supreme Court Act ss 18( 1) and 19. 72 Supreme Court Act s 73 Supreme Court Act s 19. 74 (2001) 207 CLR 72. 75 (2001) 207 CLR 72 at 78 [10], 87 [38]; cf The Commonwealth v Bank of......
-
Harold v Jameson & Jameson & Future Print Ltd v Farrell and Others T/A Farrell Grant Sparks
...raised their costs, in relation to the High Court costs of the aforesaid, the matter came before the Taxing Master on the 5th, 6th,7th, 18th and 19th May and17th June, 1999. A reserved ruling was delivered by him on 28th June, 1999. Both parties were dissatisfied with aspects of the ruling ......
-
Careif Ltd and Another v Jamaica Observer Ltd
...by law enforcement authorities such as the FSC and the Real Estate Board as proven facts. These references are found at paragraphs 18 c, d, e and 19. He further submitted that they must prove that the subject matter of the rumour is true. In Armstrong v Times Newspaper Ltd and Ors 2004 EWHC......
-
W & R Murrogh, Re v Pearson and Others
...between certificated and uncertificated shares, the Stock Exchange was anxious to have this matter considered by the court. (see 7. 1 and 19.2 below). 5.Receiver's Affidavit and Report 33 5.1 Within 15 months from the date of his appointment, the receiver avers that he was in a position to ......
Get Started for Free