Great Eastern Railway Company v The Overseers of Haughley, Resp
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Court of the Queen's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd ; Dawkins (Valuation Officer) v Ash Bros & Heaton Ltd
...7 There is a long series of cases in which the test for assessing the rateable value of hereditaments has been considered. In Great Eastern Railway Co. v. Haughley (1866) L.R. 1 Q.B. 666 Cockburn C.J., at page 679, said: "But I think it is one thing to start with the assumption that you are......
-
Decision Nº RA 480 1993. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 22-02-2000
...v Metropolitan Water Board [1926] AC 331 Staley v Castleton Overseers (1865) 5 B & S 505 Great Eastern Railway Co v Haughley Overseers (1866) LR 1 QB 666 Commissioner of Rating and Valuation v Lai Kit Lau Mutual Aid Committee [1986] HKLR 93 K Shoe Shops v Hardy (VO) [1983] 1 WLR 1273 Stirk ......
-
Williams (Valuation Officer) v Scottish and Newcastle Retail Ltd and Another
...were regularly referring to the 'hypothetical tenant' posited by the statutory test (see for instance Great Eastern Railway v Haughley (1866) LR 1 QB 666, 679; London County Council v Churchwardens of Erith [1893] AC 562, 588). In Townley Mill Co (1919) Ltd v Oldham Assessment Committee [19......
-
Best Origin Ltd v Commissioner Of Rating And Valuation
...observations on this point, repeatedly cited in later authorities, is that of Cockburn CJ in Great Eastern Railway Co v Haughley (1866) LR 1 QB 666, “But I think it is one thing to start with the assumption that you are dealing with a tenancy from year to year, and another thing to say that......
Request a trial to view additional results