Green v Russell. McCarthy (Third Party)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Judgment Date1958
Year1958
Date1958

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Malyon v Plummer
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 March 1963
    ...thought it irrelevant that the company had continued trading and some part of the £2,000 may have been lost. 21 The appellants relied on Green v. Russell (1959 2 Queen's Bench page 226) and in particular on some passages in the judgment of Lord Justice itomer with which Lord Justice Hodson ......
  • Tomlinson (A.) (Hauliers) Ltd v Hepburn
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 18 December 1964
    ...they had intended the insurance to be for the benefit of the lesser as well as themselves we are not called upon to decide. The case of Green v. Russell (1959 2 Queen's Bench page 226) would suggest that they would not". In my judgment, however, the case of Green v. Russell is distinguishab......
  • McCamley v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 July 1989
    ... ... We were referred to Green -v- Russell [1959] 2 Q.B. 226 ... That was a case where, ... right at law to the policy monies since he was not a party to the contract and therefore could not sue on it, and ... the plaintiff receives money from the benevolence of third parties prompted by sympathy for his misfortune, as in the ... ...
  • Midland Silicones Ltd v Scruttons Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 December 1961
    ... ... follow from the fact that the stevedores were not a party to the contract conferring immunity on the carriers, it was ... their own negligence do damage to the property of a third party, the person who has made a contract with their master ... ...
  • Get Started for Free