Gregor Fisken Ltd v Carl

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2021] EWCA Civ 792
Year2021
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Winch Design Ltd v Carl Le Souef
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 23 January 2025
    ...sort of factual matrix on which Mr Anderson sought to rely. Mr Board referred me to the appellate decision in Gregor Fisken Ltd v Carl [2021] EWCA Civ 792, [2021] 4 WLR 91 at [64] which makes clear that parole evidence is admissible to clarify the meaning of a contract but not to contradi......
  • Bhoomatidevi d/o Kishinchand Chugani v Nantakumar s/o v Ramachandra
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 February 2023
    ...[1845] 135 ER 439 (refd) Goh Guan Chong v AspenTech Inc [2009] 3 SLR(R) 590; [2009] 3 SLR 590 (refd) Gregor Fisken Ltd v Bernard Carl [2021] EWCA Civ 792 (folld) H O Brandt & Co v HN Morris & Co Ltd [1917] 2 KB 784 (refd) Hamid v Francis Bradshaw Partnership [2013] EWCA Civ 470 (refd) Hewle......
  • Rio Christofle v Tan Chun Chuen Malcolm
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 22 March 2023
    ...Ltd v Multifit (UK) Ltd [2009] EWHC 2565 (refd) Fan Ren Ray v Toh Fong Peng [2020] SGCA 117 (refd) Gregor Fisken Ltd v Bernard Carl [2021] EWCA Civ 792 (refd) Hamid v Francis Bradshaw Partnership [2013] EWCA Civ 470 (refd) Hector v Lyons (1988) 58 P & CR 156 (refd) iVenture Card Ltd v Big B......
  • Winch Design Limited v Carl Le Souef
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 23 January 2025
    ...sort of factual matrix on which Mr Anderson sought to rely. Mr Board referred me to the appellate decision in Gregor Fisken Ltd v Carl [2021] EWCA Civ 792, [2021] 4 WLR 91 at [64] which makes clear that parole evidence is admissible to clarify the meaning of a contract but not to contradict......
  • Get Started for Free