Gregory v Tavernor

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date06 December 1833
Date06 December 1833
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Senat v Senat
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • R v Britton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 9 March 1987
    ...provided that his cross-examination does not go further than the parts which are used for refreshing the memory of the witness: Gregory v. Tavernor. But if a party calls for and inspects a document held by the other party, he is bound to put it in evidence if he is required to do so: 15 In ......
  • Leopardstown Club Ltd v Templeville Developments Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 29 January 2010
    ...IR 15 MARITIME JURISDICTION ACT 1959 (CHARTS) ORDER 1959 SI 174/1959 MURPHY MURPHY ON EVIDENCE 7ED 2000 PARA 16.6.2 GREGORY v TAVERNOR 172 ER 1241 1833 6 CAR & P 280 SENAT v SENAT 1965 P 172 1965 2 WLR 981 1965 2 AER 505 OWEN v EDWARDS 1983 77 CR APP R 191 1983 147 JP 245 SNOWDEN v BRANSON ......
  • Steven George Pregelj and Iris Wurramura v Gary Frederick Manison [NTR]
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 December 1987
  • Get Started for Free