Griffith v Griffith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Date1957
Year1957

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Sienarine v Sieunarine
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 15 April 2007
    ...old case law [see Rose v. Rose [1950] 2 All ER 311; Le Roy-Lewis V. Le Roy-Lewis [1954] 3 All ER 57; J v. J [1955] 2 All ER 617 CA and Griffith v. Griffith [1957] 1 All ER 494] a wife's potential earning capacity was hardly if ever taken into account, particularly if the Husband's conduct w......
  • W v I
    • Hong Kong
    • Family Court (Hong Kong)
    • 9 April 2008
    ...it thinks reasonable, and to do so the court has unfettered discretion : Waller v. Waller [1956] 2 WLR 1071, CA and Griffith v. Griffith [1957] 1 WLR 478, Raydan and Jackson on Divorce and Family Matters, 18th edition, chap 28. It has also been said that the approach to maintenance pending ......
  • K v K
    • Hong Kong
    • Family Court (Hong Kong)
    • 29 February 2008
    ...court has an unfettered discretion in making the order Waller v Waller [1956] 300, [1956] 2 ALL ER 234,236, CA and Griffith v Griffith [1957] 1 ALL ER 494, iii) a broad-brush approach instead of a detailed investigation of the financial position by oral evidence should be adopted. It is bec......
  • C v H
    • Hong Kong
    • Family Court (Hong Kong)
    • 30 December 2008
    ...court has an unfettered discretion in making the order Waller v Waller [1956] 300, [1956] 2 ALL ER 234,236, CA and Griffith v Griffith [1957] 1 ALL ER 494, iii) a broad-brush approach instead of a detailed investigation of the financial position by oral evidence should be adopted. It is bec......
  • Get Started for Free