Grimaldi v White
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1801 |
| Date | 01 January 1801 |
English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 654
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS.
[95] grimaldi y white (If a party purchases an article at a certain price, pursuant to a specimen exhibited, and, on delivery, it is found to be of inferior performance, the party cannot, in an action for goods sold, set up the inferiority of it to the specimen , he should have returned it, and so have rescinded the contract ) Assumpsit for work and labour The defendant paid £ into Court , and pleaded nun assump^it. The action was brought by the plaintiff, who was a miniature painter, to recover the value oi several pictures painted by him for the defendant It was proved, That the plaintiff painted miniatures of different sizes...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Fores v Johnes, Esq
...sold by him to the defendant. The order, as proved to have been given by the defendant to the plaintiff, was, 4 BiP. 98. MAESH V. ROBINSON170 E.R. 654 IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON [97] fores v johnes, esq (Assumpsit will not lie to recover the value of prints of an obscene, immo......
