Gulbenkian v Gulbenkian
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1927 |
| Date | 1927 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Re McDonald
...In re (No. 3), Hartley v. Fuld, [1968] P. 675; [1965] 3 All E.R. 776, dicta of Scarman J. applied. (9) Gulbenkian v. Gulbenkian, [1937] 4 All E.R. 618; (1937), 158 L.T. 46, dictum of Langton J. applied. (10) Jopp v. WoodENRENR(1865), 4 De G.J. & S. 616. 46 E.R. 1057. (11) May v. May, [1943]......
-
H v H
...(3) Cruh v. Cruh, [1945] 2 All E.R. 545; (1945), 115 L.J.P. 6; 173 L.T. 367; 62 T.L.R. 16, referred to. (4) Gulbenkian v. Gulbenkian, [1937] 4 All E.R. 618; (1937), 158 L.T. 46, dictum of Langton J. applied. (5) Hawkes v. Hawkes, 1996 CILR 317, applied. (6) Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier, [1895......
-
Christina Lynn Estrada v Walid Bin Ahmed Abdallah Al-Juffali
...in Bromley v. Tryon , that difficulty of ascertainment is not by any means fatal to a clause of this kind." 63 Finally, Langton J in Gulbenkian v Gulbenkian [1937] 4 All ER 618 at 627 observed: "In other word, the intention must be a present intention to reside permanently, but it does not ......
-
Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian
...at 458 ([16] supra); Doucet v Geoghegan (1878) 9 Ch D 441 (CA); Waddington v Waddington (1920) 36 TLR 359; Gulbenkian v Gulbenkian [1937] 4 All ER 618, 22 Dicey observed that the animus manendi rarely is manifested positively in the form of a person’s determination to spend the rest of his ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Family Law
...to the wife as part of her share of the matrimonial assets. This is the position of the English courts: see Gulbenkian v Gulbenkian[1927] P 237, where the court extinguished the interest of a divorced wife in life insurance policies where she was named as beneficiary. (f) In any case where ......
-
SECTION 73 CLPA1: ASSURANCE FOR THE SPOUSE AND CHILDREN
...39 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s24. 40 [1949] P 77. See also Lort-Williams v Lort-Williams[1951] P 395. Also see Gutbenkian v Gulbenkum[1927] P 237. 41 Cap 353, 1985 Ed. 42 The old s 106 refers to assets acquired by the parties; the amended s 106 uses the term “matrimonial assets”. 43 In C......