Gyles v Hall
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1726 |
| Date | 01 January 1726 |
English Reports Citation: 24 E.R. 774
LORD CHANCELLOR KING.
Gyles
and
Hall
Referred to, Kinnard v. Trollope, 1889, 42 Ch. D. 616; Bank of New South Wales v. O'Connor, 1889, 14 App. Cas. 284.
Case 113.-gyles versus hall. [1726.] [Referred to, Kinnard v. Trollops, 1889, 42 Ch. D. 616 ; Bank of New South Wales v. O'Connor, 1889, 14 App. Cas. 284.] Lord Chancellor King. As to a tender of mortgage money, there ought to be reasonable notice of paying it in ; and if the tender be insisted on to stop interest, the money must be kept dead from that time, because the party is to be uncore prist. Six months notice given to pay in the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Rathner (Liquidator), in the matter of PE Capital Nominees Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Runner Investment Limited
...Properties Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 594; (1980) 1 All ER 371 Formby v Barker [1903] 2 Ch 539 Graham v Seal (1918) 88 LJ Ch 31 Gyles v Hall (1726) 2 P Wms 378; 24 ER 774 Hunter v Macklew (1846) 67 ER 902 Harmer v Armstrong [1934] 1 Ch 65 In re Schebsman; Official Receiver v Cargo James v Rumsey [187......
- Barratt v Gough-Thomas (No. 2)
-
George Joy, Henry Hall Joy, and Elizabeth Joy, - Appellants; Wyrley Birch, Charles Wollaston, William Miles, and Dorothy Rose, his Wife, and Thomas William Coke, - Respondents
...(3 Car. and P. 342). These are cases of legal tender, but there must be good tender in equity, as at law, to stop interest: Gyles v. Hall (2 P. Wms. 378), Bishop v. Church (2 Ves. sen. 372), Meade v. Earl of Brandon (2 Dow. 268). A purchaser, in order to- escape the payment of interest on t......
