H v H (Financial Provision: Capital Allowance)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1993
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Thomas v Thomas
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 May 1995
    ...v Browne [1989] 1 FLR 291, Crittenden v Crittenden [1990] 2 FLR 361, Green v Green [1993] 1 FLR 326, and H v H (Capital Provision) [1993] 2 FLR 335. 6 THE FAMILY HISTORY 7 The husband and wife are now aged 43 and 34. They were married on 23rd August 1980 and their two sons were born in Nove......
  • Kews v Nchc
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Final Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 15 February 2013
    ...1 FLR 291, Crittenden v Crittenden[1990] 2 FLR 361, Green v Green [1993] 1 FLR 326, and H v H (Financial Provision: Capital Assets) [1993] 2 FLR 335. ...
  • White v White
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 June 1998
    ...are invariably stressful and costly. For any family they should be a last resort. In H v H (Financial Provision: Capital Allowance) [1993] 2 FLR 335 at 347 I expressed my opinion that the discretionary powers of the court to adjust capital shares between spouses should not be exercised unle......
  • H v H
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 13 December 1999
    ...[1990] 2 All E.R. 84; [1990] 1 FLR 140, dicta of Butler-Sloss, L.J. applied. (5) H v. H, (Financial Provision: Capital Allowance), [1993] 2 FLR 335; [1993] F.C.R. 308. (6) Miller v. Miller, 1980–83 CILR N–6, applied. (7) Newton v. Newton, [1990] 1 FLR 33; [1989] F.C.R. 521n, dicta of Sir Ro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Financial Entitlement In Short Marriages
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 1 April 2019
    ...periodical payments were to be limited to a set period of time pending receipt of a deferred lump sum. H v H (financial provision) [1993] 2 FLR 335 This was a short marriage. Singer J voiced the opinion that if the court was concerned with assets derived from a pre-marital acquisition or gi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT