Haile v West
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1939 |
| Date | 1939 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Koh Sin Chong Freddie v Chan Cheng Wah Bernard
...Joshua Benjamin [1998] 2 SLR (R) 971; [1998] 3 SLR 337 (folld) Habib v Radio 2 UE Sydney Pte Ltd [2012] NSWDC 12 (folld) Haile v West [1940] 1 KB 250 (folld) Harris Solid State (M) Sdn Bhd v Bruno Gentil s/o Pereira [1996] 3 MLJ 489 (refd) Hoban Steven Maurice Dixon v Scanlon Graeme John [2......
-
Roy Melvyn Brown and Another (Plaintiffs/Appellants) v The Commissioner of Police and Another
...were open to Mr O'Connor, which in my view it is not, it would not, in my judgment, help him. My attention has been drawn to Haile and Others v West [1940] 1 KB 250 which is, as I read the case, clear authority for the proposition that the discretion given to the court in relation to transf......
-
Koh Sin Chong Freddie v Chan Cheng Wah Bernard and others and another appeal
...to grant High Court costs because the plaintiffs each recovered less than 50 pounds. Gallivan was followed in Haile & Others v West [1940] 1 KB 250, where the English Court of Appeal held that in respect of the claims of co- plaintiffs, even though they arose from the same transaction, the ......
-
Brown v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis ; White v Same
...deal with the matter as if it had been in the county court throughout. Even if it were, it would not have helped him. Hailes v WestELR ([1940] 1 KB 250), which followed Davies v DaviesELR ([1928] 1 KB 364), was clear authority for the proposition that the discretion given to the court in re......
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...the Supreme Court of Victoria in Brien v Watts[1964] VR 673). The Court of Appeal in Koh Sin Chong Freddie also considered Haile v West[1940] 1 KB 250, in which the English Court of Appeal decided against aggregation because each of the plaintiffs had a separate cause of action. Scrutton LJ......