Haji Abdul Rahman v Mahomed Hassan
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1917 |
| Date | 1917 |
| Year | 1917 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
- Tan Ong Ban v Teoh Kim Heng
- Wan Salimah Wan Jaffar v Mahmood Omar; Anim Abdul Aziz (Intervener)
-
W v (1) J H (2) A County Council
...argument Mr Wolanski submits that the basis of the qualified privilege the Defendants rely on is the well known passage in Adam v Ward [1917] AC 209 at 234: “A privileged occasion is … an occasion where the person who makes a communication has an interest, or a duty, legal or moral, to make......
-
Dr Christopher Sydney Daniels v British Broadcasting Corporation
...are obviously privileged, subject to malice, in accordance with the classic statement of principle of Lord Atkinson in Adam v Ward [1917] A.C. 209 at 334 (cited in Gatley at paragraph 14.6) where he said: “A privileged occasion is…an occasion where the person who makes a communication has a......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Land Law
...LTA to reduce uncertainty and to give finality in land dealings. 18.27 In fact, the Privy Council in Haji Abdul Rahman v Mahomed Hassan[1917] AC 209 at 216 had earlier cautioned against undue reliance on the doctrines of English equity and conscience when dealing with the Torrens system of ......