Halifax Mortgage Services Ltd v Stepsky
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Judgment Date | 16 June 1995 |
| Date | 16 June 1995 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
16 cases
-
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2); Kenyon-Brown v Desmond Banks & Company (Undue Influence) (No 2); Bank of Scotland v Bennett; UCB Home Loans Corporation Ltd v Moore; National Westminster Bank Plc v Gill; Midland Bank Plc v Wallace; Barclays Bank Plc v Harris; Barclays Bank Plc v Coleman
...discovered unless he was acting as the bank's solicitor at the time when he discovered it: see Halifax Mortgage Services Ltd. v Stepsky [1996] Ch. 207. This requirement has sometimes been overlooked. It appears, for example, to have been overlooked in Lancashire Loans Ltd. v Black (supra), ......
-
JK v A Local Health Board
... ... QC and Ms Emma Sutton (instructed by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership — Legal & Risk Services ) for the Applicant ... Mr ... ...
-
Child and Family Agency v HL and Another
...step is objectively necessary to safeguard the child’s own constitutional rights. As O’Flaherty J. observed in Southern Health Board v. CH [1996] 1 I.R. 219, “…the child’s welfare must always be of far graver concern to the Court. We must, as judges, hearken to the constitutional command wh......
-
A Healthcare v CC (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)
... ... 13 CC came to the attention of social services following concerns from his mother regarding the management of his ... ...
Get Started for Free
20 books & journal articles
-
The Constitutional Protection of Children in Ireland ? Assessing the Need for Reform and the Available Alternatives
...judgment of Mrs Justice McGuinness in Baby Ann [2006] 4 IR 374 at p 498. See also, DPP v JT [1988] 3 Frewen 141; Southern Health Board v CH [1996] 1 IR 231; DPP v Best [2000] 2 IR 17. 9 http://www.omc.gov.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=%2Fdocuments%2Flegislation%2FconstRef.htm 10 Carl O’Brien, “Andrews ......
-
The Functional Constitution: Re-Reading the 2014 High Court Constitutional Term
...University Press, 2004). 159 See, eg, Janet Hiebert, Limiting Rights: The Dilemma of Judicial Review (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1996) ch 1-3. 2015 The Functional Constitution 483 _____________________________________________________________________________________ consideration to th......
-
Frustration
...D. “Absolute Liability in Contract: The Antecedents of Para-dine v. Jayne ” in FD Rose, ed, Consensus ad Idem (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1996) ch 1. KULL, A. “Mistake, Frustration, and the Windfall Principle” (1991) 43 Hastings LJ 1. LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. Report on the N......
-
Stalking and the Military: A Proposal to Add an Anti-Stalking Provision to Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice
...PROGRAMS, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, STALKING, AND ANTISTALKING LEGISLATION: ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS, MARCH 1996, ch. 1, available at [hereinafter ANTI-STALKING 8. STALKING AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, supra note 4. 9. Id. 10. 18 U.S.C. § 2261A (2000). 11. See 10 U.S.C. §......
Get Started for Free
1 provisions
-
S.D. Const. art. VIII § 11 Investment of Permanent Educational Funds
...by SL 1984, ch 1, rejected Nov. 6, 1984; amendment proposed by SL 1993, ch 4, §§ 1 and 2, rejected Nov. 8, 1994; amendment proposed by SL 1996, ch 1, §§ 1 and 2 (Senate Joint Resolution 001), approved Nov. 5, 1996; amendment proposed by SL 1998, ch 3, rejected Nov. 3, 1998; amendment propos......
