Hall v Burnell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Ong Hun Seang and Others v Yeoh Oon Teik and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 19 July 1996
    ...were entitled to pay the money to the vendors or to deal with it without the consent of both parties.Mr Wee referred to Hall v Burnell [1911] 2 Ch 551. The contract for sale and purchase provided that the deposit was to be paid to the vendor`s solicitors as stakeholders. The purchaser made ......
  • Firodi Shipping Ltd v Griffon Shipping Llc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 December 2013
    ...is to be paid to a third party stakeholder does not affect the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract. As Eve J said in Hall v Burnell [1911] 2 Ch. 551 at 554:- "I cannot conceive that the mere fact that the money is placed for the time being in the hands of a third party as ......
  • Kan Yeow Wing; Kian Hin & Company Ltd
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Bunga Nominees Sdn Bhd v Abdul Jabbar Majid & 3 Ors
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT