Hambrook v Stokes Brothers
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1925 |
| Date | 1925 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
57 cases
-
Wicks v State Rail Authority of New South Wales Sheehan v State Rail Authority of New South Wales
...words used. More particularly, ‘being … put in peril’ is not to be confined to the kind of apprehended casualty which was at issue in Hambrook v Stokes Bros16, where a mother feared a runaway lorry might have injured her child. It is not to be read as confined to the cases discussed by Evat......
-
King v Phillips
...point was not dealt with in the Judgment of the Court which was given by Lord Justice MacKinnon. 18 The decision of this Court in Hambrook v. Stokes Brother, reported in 1925 1 King's Bench Division at page 141, was not directly overruled by the House of Lords in Hay or Bourhill v. Young; i......
-
Alcock and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
...regards communication, there is no case in which the law has compensated shock brought about by communication by a third party. In Hambrook v. Stokes Brothers [1925] 1 K.B. 141, indeed, it was said that liability would not arise in such a case and this is surely right. It was so decided in......
-
Schneider v Eisovitch
...In re Polemis and Furness Withy & Co. Ltd. [1921] 3 K.B. 560; 37 T.L.R. 940 applied. Hambrook v. Stokes Brothers [1925] 1 K.B. 141; 41 T.L.R. 125; and Bourhill v. Young [1943] A.C. 92; [1942] 2 All E.R. 396 The deceased's estate, which passed to the plaintiff, consisted of a butcher's b......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Secondary Victim Claims ' Where Are We Now?
...that otherwise satisfies the Alcock criteria as now interpreted by the Supreme Court in Paul might succeed. Footnotes 1. Hambrook v Stokes Brothers [1925] 1 KB 141; Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92; Hinz v Berry [1970] 2 QB 40 2. Per Lord Oliverin Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Po......
2 books & journal articles
-
PTSD and the Law
...Coultas (Victoria, Australia, but decided whilst still under 34 Dulieu v White & Sons [1901] 2 KB 669 . 35 Hambrook v Stokes Brothers [1925] 1 KB 141. 36 International Ocean Telegraph Company, Appellant v Charles Saunders 32 Fla. 434 (1893). 37 Robb v Pennsylvania Railroad, May 28, 1965, 58......
-
Tort Law
...to secondary victims, initially to cases where the claimant feared not for herself but for another person (Hambrook v Stokes Brothers[1925] 1 KB 141), and then to cases where the claimant witnessed a traumatic event: McLoughlin v O”Brien[1983] 1 AC 410. 22.86 Secondary victim cases by their......
