Hamlin v Hamlin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1985 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
- BJ v MJ (Financial Order: Overseas Trust)
-
Ruanne Dellal v Guy Dellal and Others
...claimant. vi) Where the defendant is out of the jurisdiction that the order for payment would be enforceable in the foreign land: see Hamlin v Hamlin [1986] Fam 11, CA, at 18 per Kerr LJ. vii) The court should exercise its discretion to make an order for a payment to the estate. 12 The defe......
-
Ankita Goyal v Amit Goyal
...also be futile. This territorial self-restraint reflects the rule of statutory interpretation referred to above. The leading case is Hamlin v Hamlin [1986] Fam 11, cited by the Court of Appeal in this case at paragraph 33. 35 In paragraph 33 McFarlane LJ stated: "This is part of a wider poi......
-
Gillian Christine Hope (aka Lewis, formerly Krejci) (Applicant) Libor Stanislav Karol Krejci (First Respondent) Trustees of the Krejci Family Trust (Second Respondents) Damsonetti Holdings Ltd (Third Respondent)
...that the order would be implemented by the court exercising effective control over the trust ( Goff v Goff [1934] P 107, Hamlin v Hamlin [1986] Fam 11). If, however, the Court is satisfied that the variation order will be effective against the husband in personam, then the order is more lik......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
De Facto Cohabitation: the International Private Law Dimension
...(n 30) paras 2.51-2.67; Razelos v Razelos [1970] 1 WLR 390; Galbraith v Galbraith 1971 SC 65; Bain v Bain 1971 SC 146; Hamlin v Hamlin [1986] Fam 11; Sandford v Sandford [1985] 15 Fam Law 230; Holmes v Holmes [1989] Fam 47. Given the strong and bullish attitude of Europe (and in light of po......