Hanley v Pease & Partners
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Divisional Court |
| Year | 1915 |
| Date | 1915 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
38 cases
-
Miles v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
...an abatement of price on that account, he must be considered as having received satisfaction for the breach of contract …" 40In Hanley v. Pease & Partners Ltd. [1915] 1 K.B. 698, where a worker absented himself without leave for one day, the employer suspended him from work the following d......
-
Re Opai Kunangel Amin [1991] PNGLR 1; Supreme Court Reference No 2 of 1982; Re Kunangel; In the Matter of a Reference under s18(2) of the Constitution by and Independent Tribunal appointed pursuant to s27(7)(e) of the Organic Law on the Duties and Responsibilities of Leadership; and In the Matter of a reference by the Public Prosecutor pursuant to s27(2) of the Organic Law on the Duties and Responsibilities of Leadership in respect of Opai Kunangel Amin
...Dunn v R [1896] 1 QB 116, Edwards (Inspector of Taxes) v Clinch [1980] 3 WLR 521; [1980] 3 All ER 278, Hanley v Pease & Partners Ltd [1915] 1 KB 698, Hunkin v Siebert (1934) 51 CLR 538, Inland Revenue Commissioner v Hambrook [1956] 2 QB 641, SCR No 5 of 1980; Re Joseph Auna [1980] PNGLR 500......
-
Browning v Crumlin Valley Collieries
... ... Stones F12 ; Hanley v. Pease & Partners F13 ; and Devonald v. Rosser & Son. F14 In Cuckson v. Stones F12 the ... ...
-
The State v Officer–in–Charge of the Wabag Corrective Institution and the Magistrates of the Kundis Village Court; Ex Parte Pende Kinakope [1982] PNGLR 308; SCR No 6 of 1981; State v OIC Wabag Corrective Institution [1982] PNGLR 308
...v The Queen [1896] 1 QB 116. Edwards (Inspector of Taxes) v Clinch [1980] 3 WLR 521; [1980] 3 All ER 278. Hanley v Pease & Partners Ltd [1915] 1 KB 698. Hunkin v Siebert (1934) 51 CLR 538. Inland Revenue Commissioner v Hambrook [1956] 2 QB 641. SCR No 5 of 1980, Re Joseph Auna [1980] PNGLR ......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
DEALING WITH EMPLOYEE CRIMES
...Co Ltd[1982] ICR 140 at 144. See also DHL Sdn Bhd Selangor v Ravendiran a/l Subramaniam[1997] 1 ILR 52. 70 Hanley v Pease & Partners [1915] 1 KB 698. 71 See, for instance, Turner v Sawdon[1901] 2 KB 653. 72 See Henthorn and Taylor v CEGB[1980] IRLR 361; Mercantile Bank Ltd v The Singapore B......
-
Comment
...Claims Act 2016 (Act 21 of 2016) s 27(2)(c). 79 Employment Act (Cap 91, 2009 Rev Ed) s 14(8). 80 Hanley v Pease & Partners Ltd [1915] 1 KB 698. 81 See, for instance, Henthorn and Taylor v Central Electricity Generating Board [1980] IRLR 361 and Burns v Santander UK plc [2011] IRLR 639. 82 S......
-
Job Security or Income Support
...C.A.R. 121, 125 (Cl.6);Storemen and Packers (General Stores)Award(1969) 128 C.A.R. 581, 584 (Cl.8).12E.g. Hanley v. Pease and PartnersLtd[1915] 1K.B. 698; Marshall v. EnglishElectric Co.Ltd[1945] 1All E.R. 653; Devonald v. Rosser &Sons [1906] 2K.B.728. But note Browning v. Crumlin Valley Co......
