Harmer v Armstrong
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1934 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
Loh Sing Cher v Tan Ah Chow
...... NCL and does not affect the performance of the obligations of the plaintiff and NCL under their contract.Counsel for the defendants relied on Harmer v Armstrong & Ors [1933] All ER 778 and submitted that the plaintiff, being merely a beneficial owner of the shares, cannot sue and maintain the ......
-
Roberts v Gill & Company and Another
...trust could bring proceedings in his own name and where the trustees refused to sue, joining the other beneficiaries as defendants: Harmer v Armstrong [1934] Ch 65. 18 In Hayim v Citibank NA [1987] 1 AC 730, where a trustee (HK) held the trust property on trust for C, the trustee of another......
-
Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd
...... MR J ALTHAUS (Instructed by Messrs Armstrong & Co, London SE25 3XU) appeared on behalf of the Respondent. (Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of Smith Bernal Reporting ......
- Leela Ratos, Dr & 5 Ors v Anthony Ratos s/o Domingos Ratos & 9 Ors
Request a trial to view additional results
1 provisions
-
Chapter 346, HB 659 – An act relating to the public good and making an appropriation therefor
...transferred to it for the benefit of the existing annuitants as long as such annuitants live. Such investment shall be governed by Acts 1934, Ch. 65, Art. IX, except that the local board of education is substituted for the board of trustees of the local retirement system. The local board of......