Harmer v Armstrong

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 cases
  • Loh Sing Cher v Tan Ah Chow
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 May 1990
    ...... NCL and does not affect the performance of the obligations of the plaintiff and NCL under their contract.Counsel for the defendants relied on Harmer v Armstrong & Ors [1933] All ER 778 and submitted that the plaintiff, being merely a beneficial owner of the shares, cannot sue and maintain the ......
  • Roberts v Gill & Company and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 July 2008
    ...trust could bring proceedings in his own name and where the trustees refused to sue, joining the other beneficiaries as defendants: Harmer v Armstrong [1934] Ch 65. 18 In Hayim v Citibank NA [1987] 1 AC 730, where a trustee (HK) held the trust property on trust for C, the trustee of another......
  • Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 October 2001
    ...... MR J ALTHAUS (Instructed by Messrs Armstrong & Co, London SE25 3XU) appeared on behalf of the Respondent. (Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of Smith Bernal Reporting ......
  • Leela Ratos, Dr & 5 Ors v Anthony Ratos s/o Domingos Ratos & 9 Ors
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT