Harmer v Armstrong
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1934 |
| Year | 1934 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
32 cases
-
Loh Sing Cher v Tan Ah Chow
... ... NCL and does not affect the performance of the obligations of the plaintiff and NCL under their contract.Counsel for the defendants relied on Harmer v Armstrong & Ors [1933] All ER 778 and submitted that the plaintiff, being merely a beneficial owner of the shares, cannot sue and maintain the ... ...
- Loh Sing Cher v Tan Ah Chow and Another
-
Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd
... ... MR J ALTHAUS (Instructed by Messrs Armstrong & Co, London SE25 3XU) appeared on behalf of the Respondent ... (Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of Smith Bernal Reporting ... ...
-
Roberts v Gill & Company and Another
...trust could bring proceedings in his own name and where the trustees refused to sue, joining the other beneficiaries as defendants: Harmer v Armstrong [1934] Ch 65. 18 In Hayim v Citibank NA [1987] 1 AC 730, where a trustee (HK) held the trust property on trust for C, the trustee of another......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Assisting a Breach of Duty by a Fiduciary, the Common Law and Money-laundering
...609. 85 Baden [1983] 1 WLR 509, 574C—D, para 244; Brink’s-Mat v Noye [1991] 1 Bank LR 68. 86 Royal Brunei [1995] 2 AC 378, 391; Harmer v Armstrong [1934] Ch 65; Field v Firmenich [1971] 1 All ER 87 [1995] 2 AC 378, 392. 88 [1995] 2 AC 207; Baden v Société Generale [1993] 1 WLR 509, 610–612.......
-
Legal Relations between Principal and Third Party
...Mandler & Co Ltd and D Mandler [1939] 2 KB 129, 136 per Branson, J. 11 (1871) LR 6 Ch App 525. 12 (1813) 1 M & S 573. 13 Eg, Harmer v Armstrong [1934] Ch 65, where it was held that as all the parties to the agreement were fore the court, the fact that the agreement was under seal did no......
-
Table of Cases
...LBC v Ahmed [2018] HLR 9 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6.48 Harmer v Armstrong [1934] Ch 65 ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10.07, 10.79 Harper & Co v Vigers Bros......
-
Table of Cases
...63 Hampshire Land Co, Re [1896] 2 Ch 743 145 Hannah Blumenthal, The [1983] 1 AC 854 84 Hardingham v Nicholls (1745) 3 Atk 304 85 Harmer v Armstrong [1934] Ch 65 156 Harpham v Shacklock (1881) 19 CH D 207 118 Hart v Frontino Gold Mining Co (1870) LR 5 Ex 111 9 Hartog v Collin and Shields [19......
1 provisions
-
Chapter 346, HB 659 – An act relating to the public good and making an appropriation therefor
...transferred to it for the benefit of the existing annuitants as long as such annuitants live. Such investment shall be governed by Acts 1934, Ch. 65, Art. IX, except that the local board of education is substituted for the board of trustees of the local retirement system. The local board of......
