Harris v Chesterfield (Earl)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1911 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Polo Woods Foundation v Shelton-Agar and Another
...would be no additional benefit in being able to use the Triangle for grazing. 77. The formulation in earlier authorities (such as Lord Chesterfield v Harris) that there must be some relation between the needs of the estate and the extent of the profits, or that the right is limited to the w......
-
Beckett (Alfred F.) Ltd v Lyons
...it self able, by what was afterwards described as a splendid effort of equitable imagination (see Lord Ashbourne's observations in Harris v. Lord Chesterfield, 1911 Appeal Cases at page 633t see also Lord Justice Hamilton in Attorney-General v. Horner (No. 2) 1913 2 Chancery at page 190), t......
-
Bettison and Another v Langton and Others
...to pasture a fixed number of animals, Mr Chapman, counsel for the appellants, relied on Baylis v Tyssen-Amhurst (1877) 6 Ch 500 and Chesterfield v Harris in the Court of Appeal [1908] 2 Ch 397, and in the House of Lords [1911] AC 623. Both these cases were concerned not with the severabil......
-
Loose v Lynn Shellfish Ltd
...limited (or a right of way or a right to light), it is capable of surviving independently of any land owned by the grantee — see Harris v Earl of Chesterfield [1911] AC 32 Historically, it has long been accepted that the Crown is prima facie the owner of the bed of the sea, and of the fore......
Request a trial to view additional results