Harris v Petherick
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1878 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Whitmore v O'Reilly
...JJ. (1) [1903] 2 K. B. 756. (2) 72 L. J. (N. S.) K. B. 152. (3) 20 L. R. Ir. 582, 590. (4) 39 Ir. L. T. R. 241. (5) 18 L. R. Ir. 40. (6) 4 Q. B. D. 611. (7) 13 Ch. D. 228. (8) [1899] 2 Ch. 467. (9) 6 L. R. Ir. 155. (1) 5. Times L. R. 42. (1) 4 Q. B. D. 611. (2) 55 L. J. (N. S.) Q. B. 566. (......
-
Pillar Resource Services Inc. v PrimeWest Energy Inc, 2017 ABCA 19
...of costs in a situation where the successful plaintiff has made unfounded or unsubstantiated charges of fraud”); Harris v. Petherick, 4 Q.B.D. 611 1879) (the Court upheld the trial judge’s cost order requiring the plaintiff who received only a very small portion of the damages sought to pay......
-
Perry v Stopher
...success as to a small part, again, I think, needs no authority, but, if authority he needed, it is to be found as long ago as 1879 In Harris v. Petherlok. (1879) 4 Queen's Bench Division, page 611". 28 On this part of the case it seems to me that Mr. Stroyan cannot show that it appears from......
- Tramountana Armadora SA v Atlantic Shipping Company SA (The Vorros)
Request a trial to view additional results