Harrison fuit oblige a Wurley en 600 l. devant le Mayre de le staple a Westminster
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
Date | 01 January 1664 |
Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 334
DEL COMMON-BANK
LIV. Harrison fuit oblige a Wurley en 600 1. devant le Mayre de le staple a Westminster & le Recorder de London solonque le Statute, le dit Harrison adonques esteant deins age 21. ana, sur que apres que le dit Harrison veign a son plein age & pluia, scilicet 23. ans, il port audita quserela sur c matter & ajuge fuit que il rien preign per son breve; car ore ne poit estre trie per inspection sil fuit deins age ou neray, & en le Register le form del breve est de allege que il est uncore deina age, & ceo fuit le Rule nient obsfcant Fits-Herbert semble al contrary fol. 104. P. 2. Eliz. R.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gene B Samuel v Sheron Whinfield
...cheques. Further, the parties agreed that 75% of the stocks, implements and trade materials of the partnership shall belong to Ms. Whinfield and 25% percent shall belong to Mr. Samuel. 4 Subsequently, the parties entered into another agreement which did not have the benefit of a lawyer's in......
-
Slivak v Lurgi (Australia) Pty Ltd
...they claim against Lurgi as the designer of the tower. 45 The tower was a box-like structure approximately 8 metres wide by 8 metres deep and 25 metres high with a filter system inside. The filter system necessitated the placement of four steel cell plates approximately 15 metres above grou......
-
Dean Jonas Petitioner v Jacqui Quinn-Leandro Marilyn Simon Lorna Simon The Electoral Commission Respondents [ECSC]
...could have voted for a period of 10 hours, 823 could have voted for a period of 9 hours 40 minutes, and 1,196 could have voted for 9 hours and 25 minutes. In other words, while the polls were not open for the full 12 hours, they were open for a substantial portion thereof, more than 75% of ......
-
Digicel (Jamaica) Ltd v Office of Utilties Regulation
...is supported by two Affidavits of Richard Fraser, attorney-at-law, and head of Regulatory Affairs for Digicel, filed respectively on the 13th and 25th of June 2012. 13 The OUR has opposed both Digicel's application for leave and its application for leave to operate as a stay of the proceedi......