Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Harrison v British Railways Board

Cited authorities 3 Cited in 7 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1981
Year1981
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • James Dorman v Clinton Devon Farms Partnership
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 7 November 2019
    ... ... Moreover, the decision to contrary effect was made in Harrison v British Railways Board [1928] 3 All ER 679 and the persuasive ... ...
  • Steven Keating v Andrew Hurrell and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 July 2000
    ...20Haynes v Harwood (1935) 1 KB 146; Videan v British Transport Commission (1963) 2 QB 650; Chadwick v BRB (1967) 1 WLR 912; Harrison v BRB (1981) 3 All ER 679; Ogwo v Taylor (1988) AC 431; Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant (1983) 1 WLR 1264; and Jeffrey v Commodore Cabaret Ltd (1995) 128 DLR (4t......
  • Emery v. Monarch Holdings Ltd. et al., [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. 845 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 4 June 1998
    ...of the ongoing hostilities between him and the unknown golfer. [29] I have been referred to Harrison v. British Railways Board et al. (1981) 3 All E.R. 679, a decision of Borum, J. Queen's Bench Division. At pages 684 and 685 Mr. Justice Borum says this: "So far as this court is c......
  • Lai Tai Tai v Lam Pak Lo And Another
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 3 February 2000
    ...the one party for the benefit of the other." 22. In the context of a rescuer, Boreham J. held in Harrison v. British Railways Board [1981] 3All ER 679 (at pp. 684-5) that a duty may be owed to a rescuer by the one being rescued if the latter, by lack of reasonable care for his own safety, c......
1 books & journal articles
  • Must the Surgeon Take the Pill? Negligence Duty in the Context of Cognitive Enhancement
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 77-1, January 2014
    • 1 January 2014
    ...of theanonymous reviewers for drawing our attention to this case in support of our point.61 See, eg, Harrison vBritish Railways Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 (QB) and Ogwo vTaylor [1987] 3WLR 1145 (HL).62 ibid.Must the Surgeon Take the Pill?© 2014 The Authors. The Modern Law Review © 2014 The M......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT