Harrison v Duke of Rutland

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1893
Year1893
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
47 cases
  • Hickman v Maisey
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Abdul Latif bin Ismail; Lim Kar Bee
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Thomas Condron v Galway Holding Company Ltd and Danmar Construction Ltd and Stephen Treacy and Maureen Treacy
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 Julio 2021
    ...High Court of the actual user by the public at any time of the disputed grass verge. As was noted by Lopes L.J. and Kay L.J. in Harrison v. Duke of Rutland [1893] 1 Q.B. 142, a highway is only used as a highway when it is used for passage. It is necessary to evaluate what evidence, if any,......
  • Herrick and another v Kidner and Somerset County Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 17 Febrero 2010
    ...in result, although the reasoning differs somewhat between the three law lords in the majority. Drawing on Lord Esher's judgment in Harrison v Duke of Rutland [1893] 1 QB 142, Lord Irvine of Lairg LC held that lawful activities on the highway were not only those incidental or ancillary to t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 Agosto 2019
    ...CA 22, 23 Hanscombe v Bedfordshire County Council [1938] 1 Ch 944, [1938] 3 All ER 647, 36 LGR 601, ChD 85 Harrison v Rutland (Duke) [1893] 1 QB 142, 62 LJQB 117, 68 LT 35, CA 6 Harvey v Truro RDC [1903] 2 Ch 638, 1 LGR 758, 68 JP 51, ChD 59 Hereford and Worcester County Council v Newman [1......
  • Rights of the Public
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 Agosto 2019
    ...and 7.18. 10 Kotegaonkar v Secretary of State for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs [2012] EWHC 1976 (Admin). 11 Harrison v Rutland [1893] 1 QB 142. 12 Hickman v Maisey [1900] 1 QB 752. 13 Waverley Borough Council v Fletcher [1995] 4 All ER 756. Metal detecting on a scheduled site is a......
  • Reclaiming Public Ground: The Right to Peaceful Assembly
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 63-2, March 2000
    • 1 Marzo 2000
    ...are recognised as being rightly done, and asconstituting a reasonable and usual mode of using the highway as such. If a person on a2 [1893] 1 QB 142.3 [1900] 1 QB 752.4ibid.March 2000] The Right to Peaceful AssemblyßThe Modern Law Review Limited 2000 highway does not transgress such reasona......
  • Passage and Repassage: Assembly on the Public Highway
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 63-6, December 1999
    • 1 Diciembre 1999
    ...instructive. Lord Slynn'sjudgmentis a pains-taking analysis of the prior Victorian caselaw-thefamiliar cases ofHarrisonv Dukeof Rutland [1893] 1 QB 142 andHickmanvMaisey[1900]1 QB 752. In contrast, Lord Irvine's judgment is more in keepingwiththe purposive interpretation that will be requir......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT