Harrold v Plenty

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1901
Year1901
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
30 cases
  • Tibbetts v Nikfarjam
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 19 Octubre 2004
    ...C.J.) TIBBETTS and NIKFARJAM Ms. S.M. Corbett for the plaintiff; Ms. M.P. Crinis for the defendant. Cases cited: (1) Harrold v. Plenty, [1901] 2 Ch. 314; (1901), 85 L.T. 45; 17 T.L.R. 545, distinguished. (2) Lysaght v. EdwardsELR(1876), 2 Ch. D. 499; 34 L.T. 787; 24 W.R. 778, considered. (3......
  • Chase Manhattan Bank NA; Wong Tui San and Others v; Re EG Tan & Company (Pte)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1991
  • State Bank of India Singapore v Rainforest Trading Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 4 Agosto 2011
    ...Executors of Blight v Barclay and Others, Assignees of Fentham a Bankrupt (1802) 2 East 227; 102 ER 356 (folld) Harrold v Plenty [1901] 2 Ch 314 (folld) Hunter v Hunter [1936] AC 222 (folld) Kong Swee Eng v Rolles Rudolf Jurgen August [2011] 1 SLR 873 (folld) MUI Bank Bhd v Alkner Investmen......
  • Re City Securities Pte
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 Abril 1990
    ...366 (refd) Evans v Rival Granite Quarries [1910] 2 KB 979 (refd) Flinders Trading Co, Re [1977-1978] ACLC 29738 (folld) Harrold v Plenty [1901] 2 Ch 314 (folld) Hart v Barnes [1983] 2 VR 517 (refd) Hilton v Tucker (1888) 39 Ch D 669 (refd) Hubbard & Co, Re (1898) 68 LJ Ch 54 (folld) Illingw......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT