Harvey against Wright
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1795 |
| Date | 01 January 1795 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 88 E.R. 616
COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER
Harvey against Wright
[40] case 30. harvey against wright. If a cause has not been proceeded in for four terms, a whole term must intervene between the notice and the trial. There was this question raised concerning understanding a rule of Court (a). The rule was, that if a cause waa not at all prosecuted in four terms, neither party could revive process, without giving the other a term's notice. The...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
...(38) Rawstone v. Preston Corp.ELR(1885), 30 Ch. D. 116; 52 L.T. 922, referred to. (39) Say & Seal (Lord)”s CaseENR(1712), 10 Mod. 41; 88 E.R. 617, referred to. (40) Southwark & Vauxhall Water Co. v. QuickELR(1878), 3 Q.B.D. 315, dicta of Cockburn, C.J. considered. (41) Telesystem Intl. Wire......
-
Rumball aginst Ball
...the action itself, perhaps, is a demand. English Reports Citation: 88 E.R. 616 COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER88 E.R. 616 COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER Rumball aginst Ball Referred to, In re George, 1890, 44 Ch. D. 629. case 29. ru......
-
Lord Say and Seal's Case
...there without such a (a) 2 Vent. 196. (b) 2 Vent. 141. (c) Plowd. Com. (d) 3 Lev. 41. () 1 Lutw. 233. 620 MICHAELMAS TERM, 10 QUEEN ANNE88 E.R. 617 COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS AND Lord Say and Seal's Case case 31. lord say and seal's case. An attorney who is employed in s......