Haward and Others v Fawcetts (A Firm) and Another

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD,LORD SCOTT OF FOSCOTE,LORD WALKER OF GESTINGTHORPE,LORD BROWN OF EATON-UNDER-HEYWOOD,LORD MANCE
Judgment Date01 March 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] UKHL 9
CourtHouse of Lords
Date01 March 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
131 cases
  • Graham Frank Davy v 01000654 Ltd (Formerly Heather Moor & Edgecomb Ltd)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 9 March 2018
    ...Recognising that some other cases within those cited to me did involve a determination of the point at a trial of a preliminary issue ( Haward v Fawcetts and Jacob v Sesame are examples where that course was adopted) I do not accept Mr Howarth's submission that the Application should, in ef......
  • Stephane Etroy v Speechly Bircham LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 February 2023
    ...in whole or in part to the act or omission which is alleged to constitute negligence” (addressed in s14A(8)(a)). 74 Lord Nicholls in Haward v Fawcetts [2006] UKHL 9 [8–10] explained the degree of knowledge required for both elements as follows: “9. Thus, as to the degree of certainty requi......
  • Susan Jacobs v Sesame Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 October 2014
    ...to act on) that advice." 26 The leading authority on the application of these provisions is the decision of the House of Lords in Haward v Fawcetts [2006] 1 WLR 682, a case concerned however only with actual knowledge. Their Lordships did not perhaps speak with entirely one voice, but such ......
  • O'Sullivan v Ireland, the Attorney General
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 23 May 2019
    ...of the English Court of Appeal in Hallam-Eames has since been considered and upheld by the House of Lords in Haward v. Fawcetts (a Firm) [2006] UKHL 9, [2006] 1 W.L.R. 682. That decision concerns the application of s. 14A of the Limitation Act 1980, as inserted by the Latent Damage Act 19......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • Financial Mis-Selling Key Case | Booker Anor v RT Financial Services UK Limited
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 2 May 2017
    ...to bring such an action." After considering the relevant case-law (including the House of Lords' decision in Haward v Fawcetts (A Firm) [2006] UKHL 9 and the Court of Appeal's decision in Shore v Sedgwick Financial Services Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 863), Master Matthews decided it was only n......
  • Tax Advice Under Scrutiny: Halsall V Champion Consulting
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 19 December 2017
    ...[1957] 1 WLR 582 8 Altus Group Ltd v Baker Tilly Tax & Advisory Services & Anor [2015] EWHC 12 (Ch) 9 Haward v Fawcetts (A Firm) [2006] 1 WLR 682 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your s......
  • Accountants' Liability Update
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 23 July 2018
    ...that it is reasonable for him to seek. The House of Lords gave guidance on what s14A requires in terms of knowledge in Haward v Fawcetts [2006] UKHL 9, clarifying that it does not mean knowing for certain but with sufficient confidence to justify the preliminaries to the issue of a claim su......
  • The High Court of Justice hands down judgment on professional negligence in tax avoidance schemes
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 26 June 2017
    ...to the issue of the claim form…the claimant must know enough for it to be reasonable to begin to investigate further" (Haward v. Fawcetts [2006] UKHL 9). The degree of detail test is knowing there was a real possibility that the damage was caused by the alleged defendants' negligence. The C......
3 books & journal articles
  • Defects
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...or by the owner if a collateral warranty was given by the subcontractor to the owner) in respect of the defect. 187 Haward v Fawcetts [2006] 1 WLr 682 at 684 [3], per Lord Nicholls. See also Kensington & Chelsea & Westminster Area Health Authority v Wettern Composites Ltd [1985] 1 all Er 34......
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...[1990] 1 WLR 472 at 479, per Lord Griiths; Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Rolf [2003] 1 AC 384 at 390 [6], per Lord Millett; Haward v Fawcetts [2006] 1 WLR 682 at 690–691 [32], per Lord Scott; Ministry of Defence v AB [2012] UKSC 9 at [6], per Lord Wilson. 2140 LITIGATION it against the risk of c......
  • The Overpaid Tax Litigation: Roadblocked
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 84-5, September 2021
    • 1 September 2021
    ...paraphrasing Deutsche Morgan n 3 above, 165 per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood.51 FII (SC II) ibid at [193], quoting Haward vFawcetts [2006] UKHL 9, [2006] 1 WLR 682 at [9]per Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead.1112 © 2021 The Author.The Modern Law Review © 2021 The Modern Law Review Limited.(2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT