Hayes v James & Charles Dodd (A Firm)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year1990
Date1990

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
65 cases
  • Patel and Another v Hooper & Jackson (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 Noviembre 1998
    ... ... , the recorder was much influenced by the decision of this court in Hayes v. James & Charles Dodd [1990] 2 All ER 815 , where solicitors had ... ...
  • Hamilton-Jones v David & Snape (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 10 Febrero 2004
    ... ... Mr Jeffrey Littman (instructed by Messrs. Charles, Crookes and Jones) for the claimant ... Mr Edward Cross ... On the other hand, damages for mental distress were refused in Hayes -v—James & Charles Dodd [1990] 2 All ER 815 , where the individual ... ...
  • Farley v Skinner (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 Octubre 2001
    ...by the solicitors' failure to deal properly with the anti-molestation proceedings. 95 Contrast Cook v S [1967] 1 All ER 299 and Hayes v James & Charles Dodd [1990] 2 All ER 815, both solicitors' negligence cases where it was claimed that the solicitors' failure to provide the services to ......
  • British Racing Drivers' Club Ltd v Hextall Erskine & Company (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 Junio 2014
    ...190 Hassel v Khoshgoo, 2010 BCSC 233 ........................................................... 465, 473 Hayes v Dodd, [1990] 2 All ER 815 (CA) ........................................................... 260 Hayes v Schimpf, 2004 BCSC 1408, aff’d 2005 BCCA 568 ...................................
  • Compensation for Harm to Intangible Interests: Non-pecuniary and Aggravated Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Compensatory Damages
    • 21 Junio 2014
    ...v South East Thames Regional Health Authority , [1987] ICR 700 (CA). 67 See the comments of the Court of Appeal in Hayes v Dodd , [1990] 2 All ER 815 (CA), refusing to award damages for mental distress owing to solicitor’s negligence in failing to disclose that leased property did not have ......
  • Professional standards in conveyancing searches
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 16-1, June 2006
    • 1 Junio 2006
    ...EGCS 123. 16 Mercantile Building Society v JW Mitchell Dodds & Co [1993] NPC 99, Bown v Gould & Swayne [1996] PNLR 130, Hayes v Dodd [1990] 2 All ER 815. 17 Tucker v Allen [2001] PNLR 37. See also Reeves v Thrings&Long [1996] PNLR 265 per Sir Thomas Bingham, finding negligence for failure t......
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2000, December 2000
    • 1 Diciembre 2000
    ...of comfort, pleasure, peace of mind or freedom from distress, damages should be awarded (see eg, Hayes v James & Charles Dodd (a firm)[1990] 2 All ER 815). In such situations, it is undoubtedly the case that the award of damages tor mental distress is eminently appropriate. However, why sho......
  • Get Started for Free