Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1985
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 December 1991
    ...distinct from other medical conditions." 35The second relevant decision of the EAT, reported under the name Hayes v. Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute [1985] ICR 703, related to two appeals by Mrs. Hayes and a Mrs. Maughan. They were employed by different employers. When each had ......
  • Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • 14 February 1990
    ...the appeal tribunal: Turley v Allders Department Stores LtdICR ((1980) ICR 66) and Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and InstituteICR ((1985) ICR 703). The majority in Turley's case found that since a man could not become pregnant it was not possible to compare like with like as required......
  • Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 19 October 1995
    ...a period off work equivalent to what a woman would require for her confinement. In Hayes v. Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute [1985] I.C.R. 703 an Employment Appeal Tribunal differently constituted upheld the dissenting opinion of Ms. Smith in Turley's case. The Court of Appeal fol......
  • Harriton v Stephens
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 May 2006
    ...of the Bible accurately puts it, with child, and there is no masculine equivalent.’ 99 The issue subsequently arose in Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute193. In that case, Waite J made the following remarks about the decision in Turley194: ‘The logic appears flawless. Sex di......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Pregnancy, Equality and the European Court of Justice: Interrogating Gillespie
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Discrimination and the Law No. 3-2, September 1998
    • 1 September 1998
    ...person discriminates against awoman. ..if on the grounds of her sex he treats her less favourablythan he treats or would treat a man.'6 [1985] ICR 703.7 As is evident in the decisions of the lower courts inWebb v EMOCargo (UK) Limited[1990] ICR 442 (EAT); [1992] ICR 445 (CA);[1993] 1 WLR 49......
  • Pregnancy and maternity leave: employment law as a family friend?
    • United States
    • Industrial Relations Journal No. 31-2, June 2000
    • 1 June 2000
    ...1986 L225Gillespie v Northern Health & Social Services Board 1996 [1996] IRLR 214Hayes v Malleable Working Men’s Club & Institute 1985 [1985] IRLR 367Hertz v Aldi Marked 1991 [1991] IRLR 31Home Office v Holmes 1984 [1984] ICR 678IDS 1997a Maternity and Parental Leave, IDS Study 630, July, Lo......
  • Sexual Orientation Discrimination after Grant v South‐West Trains
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 63-5, September 2000
    • 1 September 2000
    ...clearly wrong)English decisions in Turley vAllders Department Stores [1980] ICR 66 and Hayes vMalleableWorking Men’s Club and Institutue [1985] ICR 703.51 Compare, eg P. Brest, ‘In Defense of the Anti-Discrimination Principle’ (1976) 90 Harvard L Rev 1,6–12; P.Westen, ‘The Empty Idea of Equ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT