Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Date | 1985 |
Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
...distinct from other medical conditions." 35The second relevant decision of the EAT, reported under the name Hayes v. Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute [1985] ICR 703, related to two appeals by Mrs. Hayes and a Mrs. Maughan. They were employed by different employers. When each had ......
-
Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
...the appeal tribunal: Turley v Allders Department Stores LtdICR ((1980) ICR 66) and Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and InstituteICR ((1985) ICR 703). The majority in Turley's case found that since a man could not become pregnant it was not possible to compare like with like as required......
-
Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
...a period off work equivalent to what a woman would require for her confinement. In Hayes v. Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute [1985] I.C.R. 703 an Employment Appeal Tribunal differently constituted upheld the dissenting opinion of Ms. Smith in Turley's case. The Court of Appeal fol......
-
Harriton v Stephens
...of the Bible accurately puts it, with child, and there is no masculine equivalent.’ 99 The issue subsequently arose in Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute193. In that case, Waite J made the following remarks about the decision in Turley194: ‘The logic appears flawless. Sex di......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Pregnancy, Equality and the European Court of Justice: Interrogating Gillespie
...person discriminates against awoman. ..if on the grounds of her sex he treats her less favourablythan he treats or would treat a man.'6 [1985] ICR 703.7 As is evident in the decisions of the lower courts inWebb v EMOCargo (UK) Limited[1990] ICR 442 (EAT); [1992] ICR 445 (CA);[1993] 1 WLR 49......
-
Pregnancy and maternity leave: employment law as a family friend?
...1986 L225Gillespie v Northern Health & Social Services Board 1996 [1996] IRLR 214Hayes v Malleable Working Men’s Club & Institute 1985 [1985] IRLR 367Hertz v Aldi Marked 1991 [1991] IRLR 31Home Office v Holmes 1984 [1984] ICR 678IDS 1997a Maternity and Parental Leave, IDS Study 630, July, Lo......
-
Sexual Orientation Discrimination after Grant v South‐West Trains
...clearly wrong)English decisions in Turley vAllders Department Stores [1980] ICR 66 and Hayes vMalleableWorking Men’s Club and Institutue [1985] ICR 703.51 Compare, eg P. Brest, ‘In Defense of the Anti-Discrimination Principle’ (1976) 90 Harvard L Rev 1,6–12; P.Westen, ‘The Empty Idea of Equ......