Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Date | 1985 |
Year | 1985 |
Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
...distinct from other medical conditions." 35The second relevant decision of the EAT, reported under the name Hayes v. Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute [1985] ICR 703, related to two appeals by Mrs. Hayes and a Mrs. Maughan. They were employed by different employers. When each had ......
-
Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
...the appeal tribunal: Turley v Allders Department Stores LtdICR ((1980) ICR 66) and Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and InstituteICR ((1985) ICR 703). The majority in Turley's case found that since a man could not become pregnant it was not possible to compare like with like as required......
-
Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
...a period off work equivalent to what a woman would require for her confinement. In Hayes v. Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute [1985] I.C.R. 703 an Employment Appeal Tribunal differently constituted upheld the dissenting opinion of Ms. Smith in Turley's case. The Court of Appeal fol......
-
Harriton v Stephens
...of the Bible accurately puts it, with child, and there is no masculine equivalent.’ 99 The issue subsequently arose in Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute193. In that case, Waite J made the following remarks about the decision in Turley194: ‘The logic appears flawless. Sex di......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Pregnancy, Equality and the European Court of Justice: Interrogating Gillespie
...person discriminates against awoman. ..if on the grounds of her sex he treats her less favourablythan he treats or would treat a man.'6 [1985] ICR 703.7 As is evident in the decisions of the lower courts inWebb v EMOCargo (UK) Limited[1990] ICR 442 (EAT); [1992] ICR 445 (CA);[1993] 1 WLR 49......
-
Pregnancy and maternity leave: employment law as a family friend?
...1986 L225Gillespie v Northern Health & Social Services Board 1996 [1996] IRLR 214Hayes v Malleable Working Men’s Club & Institute 1985 [1985] IRLR 367Hertz v Aldi Marked 1991 [1991] IRLR 31Home Office v Holmes 1984 [1984] ICR 678IDS 1997a Maternity and Parental Leave, IDS Study 630, July, Lo......
-
Constructing a legal framework for securing economic, social and cultural rights for women workers, with particular reference to structural adjustment and the Caribbean
... ... encompasses the right to safe and healthy working conditions including holidays, rest-periods, ... -law in the United Kingdom, as evidenced by Hayes v. Malleable and Webb v. Euro Air Cargo. 44 ... or guest house or with a bar, restaurant or club; 0) that of nursing or caring for the sick; ... 694, Economic Development Institute, World Bank, Washington. p. 51. The study ... ...
-
Sexual Orientation Discrimination after Grant v South‐West Trains
...clearly wrong)English decisions in Turley vAllders Department Stores [1980] ICR 66 and Hayes vMalleableWorking Men’s Club and Institutue [1985] ICR 703.51 Compare, eg P. Brest, ‘In Defense of the Anti-Discrimination Principle’ (1976) 90 Harvard L Rev 1,6–12; P.Westen, ‘The Empty Idea of Equ......