Heaven v Pender
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1882 |
| Year | 1882 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
130 cases
- Caledonian Railway Company v Mulholland or Warwick
-
ACC Bank Plc v Fairlee Properties Ltd and Others
...2 IR 513, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, Glencar Exploration plc v Mayo County Council (No 2) [2002] 1 IR 84, Heaven v Pender (1883) 11 QBD 503, Fletcher v Commissioners of Public Works [2003] 1 IR 465, Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons & Simmons [1995] 1 WLR 1602, Breslin v Corcoran ......
-
S & T Distributors Ltd v CIBC Jamaica Ltd and Others
...that will be indicated in the next sentence), a summary of the effect of the dictum of Brett MR (later Lord Esher MR) in Heaven v Pender 11 Q.B.D. 503, 509 after it was leavened with passages from Brett MR and A.L. Smith LJ from Le Lievre v Gould [1893] 1 Q.B. 491, 497, 504. Lord Atkin was......
- Tenaga Nasional Malaysia v Batu Kemas Industri Sdn Bhd (and Another Appeal)
Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
-
THE PROMISE OF UNIVERSALITY
...at 9. 15 Gary Chan, The Law of Torts in Singapore (Academy Publishing, 2011) at p 75. See, eg, George v Shivington(1869) LR 5 Ex 1. 16 (1883) 11 QBD 503. 17(1883) 11 QBD 503. 18Heaven v Pender(1883) 11 QBD 503 at 509. 19[1932] AC 562. 20Donoghue v Stevenson[1932] AC 562 at 581. 21Donoghue v......
-
Table of Cases
...649 12 Haywood v Brunswick Permanent Benefit Building Society (1881) 8 QBD 403, 46 JP 356, 51 LJQB 73, CA 15, 16, 40–41 Heaven v Pender (1883) 11 QBD 503, 47 JP 709, 52 LJQB 702, CA 240 Heronslea (Mill Hill) Ltd v Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd [2009] EWHC 295 (QB), [2009] Env LR 28, [2009] NPC 30......
-
The political purpose of the ‘mixed legal system’ conception in the law of Scotland
...University Press, 2015), p. 85-87, with furtherreferences.37. Le Lievre v. Gould, [1893] 1 QB 491, 497, 502, 504.38. Heaven v. Pender, (1883) 11 QBD 503, 509.39. Donoghue v. Stevenson, [1932] AC 562, 580-581, 582.40. D.J. Ibbetson, A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations (Oxford......
-
Case Note
...or under one of the nominate torts, for example, Wilkinson v Downton(1897) 2 QB 571 or Bird v Holbrook(1828) 4 Bing 628; 130 ER 911. 16(1883) 11 QBD 503. 17 See Coleshill v Manchester Corp[1928] 1 KB 776 at 791, cited in Max C Atkinson, “Occupier's Liability Law”(1968–1970) 3 University of ......
Get Started for Free