Heaven v Pender

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1882
Year1882
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
130 cases
6 books & journal articles
  • THE PROMISE OF UNIVERSALITY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...at 9. 15 Gary Chan, The Law of Torts in Singapore (Academy Publishing, 2011) at p 75. See, eg, George v Shivington(1869) LR 5 Ex 1. 16 (1883) 11 QBD 503. 17(1883) 11 QBD 503. 18Heaven v Pender(1883) 11 QBD 503 at 509. 19[1932] AC 562. 20Donoghue v Stevenson[1932] AC 562 at 581. 21Donoghue v......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Positive Covenants and Freehold Land Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...649 12 Haywood v Brunswick Permanent Benefit Building Society (1881) 8 QBD 403, 46 JP 356, 51 LJQB 73, CA 15, 16, 40–41 Heaven v Pender (1883) 11 QBD 503, 47 JP 709, 52 LJQB 702, CA 240 Heronslea (Mill Hill) Ltd v Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd [2009] EWHC 295 (QB), [2009] Env LR 28, [2009] NPC 30......
  • The political purpose of the ‘mixed legal system’ conception in the law of Scotland
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law No. 24-6, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...University Press, 2015), p. 85-87, with furtherreferences.37. Le Lievre v. Gould, [1893] 1 QB 491, 497, 502, 504.38. Heaven v. Pender, (1883) 11 QBD 503, 509.39. Donoghue v. Stevenson, [1932] AC 562, 580-581, 582.40. D.J. Ibbetson, A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations (Oxford......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...or under one of the nominate torts, for example, Wilkinson v Downton(1897) 2 QB 571 or Bird v Holbrook(1828) 4 Bing 628; 130 ER 911. 16(1883) 11 QBD 503. 17 See Coleshill v Manchester Corp[1928] 1 KB 776 at 791, cited in Max C Atkinson, “Occupier's Liability Law”(1968–1970) 3 University of ......
  • Get Started for Free