Henderson v Henderson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1944
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
82 cases
  • Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 December 2004
    ...see Badar Bee v. Habib Merican Noordin [1909] AC 615, 623 per Lord Macnaghten." He went on to consider the principle in Henderson v. Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100 (with which we are not concerned on this appeal), and to say that "Like principles apply in arbitration". Diplock LJ said (p.643):......
  • Yorkshire Bank Plc v Hall
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 December 1999
    ......would be dismissed (post, pp. 1728H–1729D , 1729E–G , 1730B–G ). . Henderson v. Henderson ( 1843 ) 3 Hare 100 distinguished. . Decision of Judge Maddocks sitting as a judge of the Chancery Division reversed in part. . ......
  • European Re v AEGIS
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ...agree with their conclusion. 16 For the sake of completeness, it should be added that the use in later distinct proceedings of the Henderson v Henderson principle (1843) 3 Hare 100 may fall on the other side of the line since that principle relates to issues that might have been raised but......
  • Union Discount Company Ltd v Zoller and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 November 2001
    ...Cal by the bringing of the action in New York. If it wished to advance that contention it had to do so in England. The principle in Henderson v Henderson is manifestly 29The Unity of the Law point. Mr Hubbard, submitted that since the English courts have for years proceeded on the presumpti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld TD). 191 Inglis v Inglis, [1968] P 639; Watkins v Watkins (1980), 14 RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld TD). 192 Henderson v Henderson, [1944] AC 49 (HL). See also Julien D Payne, “The Concept of Condonation in Matrimonial Causes: A Restatement of Henderson v Henderson and Crellin” (1961) ......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld TD). 183 Inglis v Inglis, [1968] P 639; Watkins v Watkins (1980), 14 RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld TD). 184 Henderson v Henderson, [1944] AC 49 (HL). See also Julien D Payne, “The Concept of Condonation in Matrimonial Causes: A Restatement of Henderson v Henderson and Crellin” (1961) ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT