Henry Boot v Malmaison

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeSwinton Thomas,Waller L JJ,Arden J.
Judgment Date28 July 2000
Date28 July 2000
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Docket NumberCase No: A2/1999/7879
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
44 cases
  • CGU International Insurance Plc v AstraZeneca Insurance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 October 2006
    ...to give leave on the merits. This follows from the language of the statute and was confirmed by this court in Henry Boot Construction (UK) Ltd v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Ltd [2001] QB 388. 12. Mr Plender however relied on the provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998. Section 6 of the Act......
  • Adyard Abu Dhabi v SD Marine Services
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 11 April 2011
    ...is likely to cause or has caused delay, the architect may not consider the impact on progress and completion of other events." 276 In the Malmaison case it was accepted that if the contractor could show that the relevant event caused concurrent delay there would be an entitlement to an exte......
  • Walter Lilly & Company Ltd v Mackay and another (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • Invalid date
  • City Inn Limited V. Shepherd Comstruction Limited
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 22 July 2010
    ... ... [27] In Henry Boot Construction Limited v Central Lancashire New Town Development Corporation 1980 15 BLR 1, ... conditions were the subject of consideration in Henry Boot Construction (UK) Limited v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Limited (1999) 70 Con LR 32, a decision by Dyson J. The matter which brought ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT