Heydon's Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Exchequer |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1584 |
| Date | 01 January 1584 |
English Reports Citation: 76 E.R. 637
IN THE EXCHEQUER
Cf. Hawkins v. Gathercole, 1855, 6 De G. M. & G. 1; 43 E. R. 1129. See R. v. Sillem, 1864, 11 L. T. 225; Easton v. Richmond Highway Board, 1871, L. R. 7 Q. B. 76; R. v. Castra, 1874, L. R. 9 Q. B. 360; River Wear Commissioners v. Adamson, 1877, 2 App. Cas. 764; R. v. Holbrook, 1878, 4 Q. B. D. 46; Harding v. Preece, 1882, 9 Q. B. D. 298; Bradlaugh v. Clarke, 1883, 8 App. Cas. 362; In re Leavesley [1891], 2 Ch. 8; Pelton Brothers v. Harrison [1891], 2 Q. B. 424; Lord Henry Bruce v. Marquess of Ailesbury [1892], A. C. 361; In re Mayfair Property Company [1898], 2 Ch. 35.
S. C. Moor 128. Co. Ent. 372. nu. 10. 1 Leon. 4. 333. 4 Leon. 117. Sav. 66. S. C. cited acc. post 9 Co. 105. a. 2 Inst. 505. 2 Cowp. 707. 709. 1 Wils. 26, 27. ii. 193. 6 T. R. 385. 6 East 480. 1 Bro. C. C. 24. 2 Bl. Com. 113. 3 Wood, 506. Watk. Gilb. Ten. 163, 4, 5, 6, 170, 1. 184. 1 Fonbl. Tr. Eq. 300 n. 1 Cru. Dig. 304. iv. 325. 1 Prest. Est. 2nd edit. 487. 1 Prest. Conv. 153, 4 Bart. Prec. 209. n. Vin. Abr. Copyhold A. pl 4. O. d. pl. 2, 3, 4. 46. Estate. R. a. 9. pl. 7. Formedon T. 3. pl. 1. Statutes E. 6. pl. 137. Com. Dig. Copyhold C. 8. N. O. Bac. Abr. Copyhold C. 1, 2, i. 709, 710, 711, 712. Execution C. 2. ii. 713. Leases &c. E. iv. 73. Statute J. 4. 6. 8, 9. vi. 383, 387. 389, 390, 391. See the notes and references infra.
Bco.REF.7a. heydon's case 637 w? :,:ò&: [7 a] heydon's case. Pasch. 26 Eliz. But the plea began Pasch. 20 Eliz. Rot. 140. in the Exchequer. 1584. [Cf. Hawkins v. Gathercole, 1855, 6 De G. M. & G. 1 ; 43 E. R. 1129. See B. v. Sillem, 1864, 11 L. T. 225 ; Eastm \. Richmond Highway Board, 1871, L. R. 7 Q. B. 76; R. v. Castro, 1874, L. R. 9 Q. B. 360; River Wear Commissioners v. Adamson, 1877, 2 App. Gas. 764; R. v. HoUrrook, 1878, 4 Q. B. D. 46; Harding v. Preece, 1882, 9 Q. B. D. 298 ; Bradlaugh v. Clarke, 1883, 8 App. Gas. 362 ; In re Leavesley [1891], 2 Ch. 8; Pelton Brothers v. Harrison [1891], 2 Q. B. 424; Lord Henry Bruce v. Marquess of Ailesbury [1892], A. C. 361 ; In re May fair Property Company [1898], 2 Ch. 35.] S. C. Moor 128. Co. Ent. 372. nu. 10. 1 Leon. 4. 333. 4 Leon. 117. Sav. 66. S. C. cited ncc.posi 9 Co. 105. a. 2 Inst. 505. [2 Cowp. 707. 709. 1 Wils. 26, 27. ii. 193. 6 T. R. 385. 6 East 480. 1 Bro. C. C. 24. 2 Bl. Com. 113. 3 Wood, 506. Watk. Gilb. Ten. 163, 4, 5, 6, 170, 1. 184. 1 Fonbl. Tr. Eq. 300 n. 1 Cru. Dig. 304. iv. 325. 1 Prest. Eat. 2nd edit. 487. 1 Prest. Conv. 153, 4 Bart. Preo. 209. n. Vin. Abr. Copyhold A. pi 4. O. d. pi. 2, 3, 4. 46. Estate. R. a. 9. pi. 7. Formedon T. 3. pi. 1. Statutes E. 6. pi. 137. Com. Dig. Copyhold C. 8. N. 0. Bac. Abr. Copyhold C. 1, 2, i. 709, 710, 711, 712. Execution C. 2. ii. 713. Leases &c. E. iv. 73. Statute J. 4. 6. 8, 9. vi. 383, 387. 389, 390, 391. See the notes and references infra.] The statute 31 H. 8. c. 13. avoids cases of lands whereof any estate for life, &c. was then in being, made by religious persons within a year before ; a copyhold was granted by copy for life, and then the religious house made a lease of it to another for 80 years ; held that the lease was void, the copyhold estate being an estate for life within the statute. Copyholds are not within the general words of a statute which alters the service, tenure, custom or interest of the land, to the prejudice of the lord or tenant, but are included within the general words of a statute where no prejudice thereby ensues to the lord or tenant. The Statute de Donis does not extend to copyholds, unless there is a special custom. The statute W. 2. c. 18. which gives the elegit does not extend to copyholds; but they are within the statute W. 2 c. 3. which gives the wife a cui in vita, and receipt ; and c. 4. giving the particular tenant a quod ei deforceat. Where a person has power to lease, reserving the moat accustomable rent for twenty years before, a verdict finding a lease rendering the customary rent, is sufficient. In an information upon an intrusion in the Exchequer (a), against Heydon, for intruding into certain lands, &c. in the county of Devon : upon the general issue, the jurors gave a special verdict to this effect. First, they found that parcel of the lands in the information was ancient copyholds of the manor of Ottery, whereof the warden and canons regular of the late college of Ottery were seised in the right of the said college ; and that the warden and canons of the said college, 22 H. 7. at a court of the said manor, granted the same parcel by copy, to Ware the father and Ware the son, for their lives, at the will of the lord, according to the custom of the said manor; and that the rest of the land in the information was occupied by S. and G. at the will of the warden and canons of the said college for the time being, in the time of H. 8. And further that the said S. and G. so possessed, and the said Ware and Ware so seised aa aforesaid, the said warden and canons by their deed indented, dated 12 January anno 30 H. 8. did lease the same to Heydon the defendant for eighty years, rendering certain rents severally for several parcels ; and found that the said several rents (a) As to an information of intrusion, see ante i. p. 16 a. (a). (ED.) 638 beydon's case sco. rep.td, in Heydon'a lease reserved, were the ancient and accustomed rents of the several parcels of the lands, and found, that after the said lease they did surrender their college, and all the possessions thereof to King Hen. 8. And further found the statute of (b) 31 Hen. 8. and the branch of it, scil. by which it is enacted, "That if any abbot, &c. or other religious and ecclesiastical house or [7 b] place, within one year next before the first day of this present Parliament, hath made, or...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
DPP v P. McC
...absurdity." The third rule of construction, the Mischief Rule, may also be considered. This rule was described in Heydon's Case (1584) 3 Co. Rep. 7:- "And it was resolved by them, that for the sure and true interpretation of all statutes in general (be they penal or beneficial, restrictive ......
-
Environmental Protection Agency v Harte Peat Ltd and Another
...[1994] E.C.R. I-3325; [1995] All E.R. (E.C.) 1; [1995] 1 C.M.L.R. 665. Frescati Estates v. Walker [1975] I.R. 177. Heydon's Case (1584) 3 Co. Rep. 7. IMPACT v. Minister for Agriculture and Food and Ors. (Case C-268/06) [2008] E.C.R. I-2483; [2009] All E.R. (E.C.) 306; [2008] 2 C.M.L.R. 1265......
-
DPP v Murphy
... ... /Respondent [1998] IESC 19 (200/98) THE SUPREME COURT Synopsis Criminal Arrest; warrant; consultative case stated; statutory interpretation of s.6, Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1997; whether evidence must be adduced that accused ... ...
-
O'Sullivan v Ireland, the Attorney General
...remedy the Oireachtas has provided to cure a particular mischief.’ See also DPP (Ivers) v Murphy [1999] 1 IR 98 quoting Heydon's Case (1584) 76 ER 637, and Attorney General v Simpson (No 2) [1959] IR 335 where Lavery J quoted at page 340 that 16th century case through the medium of the 7t......
-
Montesquieu and pepper (inspector of taxes) v. Hart
...this, we would be in the best position to judge the meaning of the text and whether it was clear or doubtful." 25 24 (1584) 3 Co. Rep. 7a; 76 E.R. 637. 25 Emphasis supplied. If we substitute for the word "we", the words, "the Executive, the Judiciary and the Legislature", the significance o......
-
Justice Ivan Rand and the role of a judge in the nation's highest court.
...198. (120) Hon. Emmett Hall, "Law Reform and the Judiciary's Role" (1972) 10 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 399. (121) (1584) 3 Co. Rep. 7a, 76 E.R. 637 (Ex. (122) Ibid., at 7b. (123) Sir F. Dwarris, A General Treatise on Statutes (London : Saunders and Benning, 1830-1831) at 690, citing Magdalen......
-
A critique of the legal framework for wildlife protection in Malawi
...authority.36 Fitzgerald v Firbank [1897] 2 Ch 96, CA; 2(1) Halsbury’s Laws of England 4th ed (2003 reissue)para 515.37 Cf Heydon’s Case (1584) 76 ER 637. In Black Cl awson International Ltd v Papierwerke WaldhofAschaffenburg AG [1975] 1 All ER 810, 815 Lord Reid stated: ‘There is a presumpt......