Hickman v Berens
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1895 |
| Year | 1895 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
18 cases
- Syarikat Marak Jaya Sdn Bhd v Syarikat Masinda Sdn Bhd
-
Goh Mui Teck v See Eng Kiat
...the client is bound by the compromise and the court will set it aside. For that proposition counsel relies on a case of Hickman v Berens [1895] 2 Ch 638. In my view the case of Hickman v Berens has no application whatever to the facts of this case. This was not a case of counsel consenting ......
- Public Bank Bhd. v Emporium Tewong Sdn. Bhd. and Another
-
Wales v Wadham
... ... H. v. H. (Family Provision: Remarriage) [ 1975 ] Fam. 9 ; [ 1975 ] 3 W.L.R. 124 ; [ 1975 ] 1 All E.R. 367 ... Hickman v. Berens [ 1895 ] 2 Ch. 638 , C.A ... Huddersfield Banking Co. Ltd. v. Henry Lister & Son Ltd. [ 1895 ] 2 Ch. 273 , C.A ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...2299, 2300,2318, 2318 Henry Stephens End. Ltd. v. Complete Home Ent. Ltd. (1987) 1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 47) 40…1953, 2076 Hickman v. Berens, (1895) 2 Ch. 638. …………………………………………………….....…..2393 High Court Eastern Region in Nsima v. OIeNnaji and Others (1961) 1 All N.L.R. 441….….1981 Hill v. Curtis, ......