Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date2013
Year2013
Date2013
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
35 cases
  • Mr B Sobnack v Loughborough University: 2601886/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 9 March 2021
    ...pieces for some conclusions to be drawn as to how the picture would have developed.” 149. Furthermore, in Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] ICR 691 EAT, the Tribunal said “[24] A ‘Polkey deduction’ has these particular features. “First, the assessment of it is predict......
  • Jane Woodward v Barnard Castle Town Council: 2503858/2019
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 4 January 2021
    ...have done if it were the employer. It is assessing the chances of what the actual employer would have done: Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] I.C.R. 691, Whilst the Tribunal will undertake the exercise based on an evaluation of the evidence before it, the exercise alm......
  • G v H: 2304196/2019
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 20 May 2021
    ...regard to paragraphs 54 and 57 and the guidance that is repeated there from the cases X v Y [2004] ICR 1634 and Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] ICR 691 (upon which the list of issues in this case was Direct Discrimination – marriage/religion 146.Section 13 Equality ......
  • B Jones v J P Morgan Securities plc: 3201630/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 29 June 2021
    ...that the employer could have dismissed the employee fairly if a fair procedure had been used. In the case of Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] I.C.R 691 (29 January 2013) Langstaff J at ¶ 24 giving the judgment of the EAT set out the particular features of a Polkey de......
  • Get Started for Free