Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 2013 |
| Year | 2013 |
| Date | 2013 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 cases
-
Mr J W Cotterill v Sodexo Ltd: 2501804/2021
...employer. It is assessing the chances of what the actual employer would have done: Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] I.C.R. 691, 90. Whilst the Tribunal will undertake the exercise based on an evaluation of the evidence before it, the exercise almost inevitably involv......
-
Mr J W Cotterill v Sodexo Ltd: 2501804/2021
...employer. It is assessing the chances of what the actual employer would have done: Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] I.C.R. 691, 90. Whilst the Tribunal will undertake the exercise based on an evaluation of the evidence before it, the exercise almost inevitably involv......
-
Mr R Headley v London Borough of Newham and others: 3203107/2019
...to ensure that there was no unjustified interference with any convention right – see Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School 2013 ICR 691, EAT. However, the tribunal itself as a public body is required by Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 to apply Section 98(4) in a manner co......
-
Mr B Sobnack v Loughborough University: 2601886/2020
...to be drawn as to how the picture would have developed.” 149. Furthermore, in Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] ICR 691 EAT, the Tribunal said “[24] A ‘Polkey deduction’ has these particular features. “First, the assessment of it is predictive: could the employer fair......
Request a trial to view additional results