Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Judgment Date2013
Date2013
Year2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
35 cases
  • Mr B Sobnack v Loughborough University: 2601886/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 9 March 2021
    ...pieces for some conclusions to be drawn as to how the picture would have developed.” 149. Furthermore, in Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] ICR 691 EAT, the Tribunal said “[24] A ‘Polkey deduction’ has these particular features. “First, the assessment of it is predict......
  • Mr D Ghelani v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: 2602160/2018
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 23 September 2020
    ...pieces for some conclusions to be drawn as to how the picture would have developed.” 164. Furthermore, in Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] ICR 691 EAT, the Tribunal said “[24] A ‘Polkey deduction’ has these particular features. “First, the assessment of it is predict......
  • L Gordon v Student Loans Company Ltd: 2501148/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 21 March 2023
    ...have done if it were the employer. It is assessing the chances of what the actual employer would have done: Hill v Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] I.C.R. 691, Whilst the Tribunal will undertake the exercise based on an evaluation of the evidence before it, the exercise alm......
  • J Oyewole v The Scottish Ministers: 4111949/2021
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 16 September 2022
    ...on the assumption that the employer would this time have acted fairly, though it did not do so beforehand.” Hill v 15 Governing Body of Great Tey Primary School [2013] ICR 691. On this issue we took account of what had been said in Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews [2007] ICR 825. In particular 1......
  • Get Started for Free