Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjack Ltd

Weekly Law Reports Cited in 27 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1983
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Henderson v Walker
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 3 September 2019
    ...citing Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5) [2002] UKHL 19, [2002] 2 AC 883 at [67] per Lord Nicholls. 118 Hillesden v Securities Ltd v Ryjack Ltd [1983] 1 WLR 959 (QB) at 119 Graham v Voigt (1989) 89 ACTR 11 (SC), relying on the line of authority arising from Jarvis v Sw......
  • Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 November 2000
    ...v BoothENRENR (1863) 1 H & C 803; 158 ER 1107. Helbert Wagg & Co Ltd, ReELR [1956] Ch 323. Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjack LtdWLR [1983] 1 WLR 959. Hiort v London and North Western Railway CoELR (1879) 4 ExD 188. Hollins v FowlerELR (1872) LR 7 QB 616; (1875) LR 7 HL 759 (HL). Hornal v Ne......
  • Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 12 November 2004
    ...is nothing logically inconsistent in an award of compensation on that basis, in addition to an award of damages for any loss in value. Hillesden v Ryjack cannot be distinguished. The fact that user damages may be awarded on top of value damages was confirmed by Lord Nicholls in paragraph 87......
  • Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 March 2002
    ...goods, together in either alternative with payment of any consequential damages, or (c) damages." 41The modern cases 489 In Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjack Ltd [1983] 1 WLR 959 Parker J applied the new Act in a case concerned with the conversion of a Rolls Royce car. He held that the cla......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Change of position and restitution for wrongs: 'ne'er the twain shall meet'?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1, April 2009
    • 1 April 2009
    ...See also Strand Electric and Engineering Co Ltd v Brisford Entertainments Ltd [1952] 2 QB 246; Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjak Ltd [1983] 2 All ER 184; Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Co [2004] EWHC 2603 (Comm) (Unreported, Cresswell J, 12 November 2004) (139) There is disagreem......
  • Adrift on a sea of troubles: cross-border art loans and the specter of ulterior title.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 38 No. 4, October 2005
    • 1 October 2005
    ...(42.) Strand Elec. & Eng'g Co. Ltd. v. Brisford Entm't Ltd., [1952] 2 Q.B. 246 (U.K.); Hillesden Sec. Ltd. v. Ryjak Ltd., [1983] 1 W.L.R. 959 (Q.B.) (U.K.); Barclays Mercantile Bus. Fin. Ltd., [1993] B.C.L.C. 1077; BAILMENT, supra note 18, at (43.) Arguments to this effect were voiced, ......
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...Engineering Sdn Bhd[1993] 1 SLR(R) 736) or compensatory (ie, focusing on the plaintiff's loss, eg, Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjack Ltd[1983] 1 WLR 959), and concluded there are elements of both: Yenty Lily at [68]. More importantly, the plaintiff should not be prevented from recovering da......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT