Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjack Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Date | 1983 |
| Year | 1983 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
18 cases
-
Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company
...in either alternative with payment of any consequential damages, or (c) damages.” 41. The modern cases 489. In Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjack LtdWLR[1983] 1 WLR 959 Parker J applied the new Act in a case concerned with the conversion of a Rolls Royce car. He held that the claimant was no......
-
Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)
...together in either alternative with payment of any consequential damages, or (c) damages." 41The modern cases 489 In Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjack Ltd [1983] 1 WLR 959 Parker J applied the new Act in a case concerned with the conversion of a Rolls Royce car. He held that the claimant wa......
-
Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company and another
...is nothing logically inconsistent in an award of compensation on that basis, in addition to an award of damages for any loss in value. Hillesden v Ryjack cannot be distinguished. The fact that user damages may be awarded on top of value damages was confirmed by Lord Nicholls in paragraph 87......
-
Workers Savings & Loan Bank, Howard Wright and Anthony Magnus v Horace Shields
...Instant case is so entitled. The learned trial judge in his judgment referred to the Strand Electric case (supra) and Hillesden Securities Ltd. v. Ryjak Ltd. and another [1983] 2 All E.R. 184, in recognising that the hiring charge was recoverable during the period of the wrongful detention......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Tort Law
...Engineering Sdn Bhd[1993] 1 SLR(R) 736) or compensatory (ie, focusing on the plaintiff's loss, eg, Hillesden Securities Ltd v Ryjack Ltd[1983] 1 WLR 959), and concluded there are elements of both: Yenty Lily at [68]. More importantly, the plaintiff should not be prevented from recovering da......