Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council v Shaw
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Year | 2000 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council v Watts
...that was not done in the case of Miss Watts. 14 The principal authority relied upon by the Council for its first proposition is Hinckley & Bosworth BC v Shaw [2000] LGR 9. The facts were that two very senior long term employees of the Council were proposing voluntary early redundancy. After......
-
Eastbourne Borough Council v Foster
...Daniel Stilitz, who has appeared on behalf of Eastbourne, has in this court also relied on Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council v. Shaw [2000] LGR 9 in particular at 39H/40G, where Bell J found that a pay increase granted for the purpose of enhancing an employee's redundancy or retirement ......
-
School Facility Management Ltd v Governing Body of Christ the King College
...on Wednesbury unreasonableness rather than the absence of a statutory power. 140 The second decision is Hinckley and Bosworth BC v Shaw [2000] LGR 9, in which a local authority agreed to increase the final year's salary of an employee specifically for the purpose of enhancing the employee's......
-
Gibb v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
...acute case because it involves a public body's reliance on its own (putative) public law wrong. Moreover cases such as Hinckley [2000] LGR 9 and Foster [2000] AER (D) 2407, relied on by Miss McNeill QC for the Trust, are to be understood as instances where a local authority unlawfully soug......
Request a trial to view additional results