Hobbs v Tinling & Company ; Hobbs v Nottingham Journal
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1929 |
| Year | 1929 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
150 cases
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v WC
...exposition of the control by the trial judge over cross-examination of a witness as to credit was given by Sankey LJ in Hobbs v Tinling [1929] 2 KB 1, 51 where he said that a court has a discretion as to “whether a question as to credit is one which the witness should be compelled to answe......
- Pang Fee Yoon v Piong Kien Siong and Others
- Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ezam bin Mohd Nor
- Pendakwa Raya; Teng Boon How
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...1997 JC 63 .... 88, 89,91, 95, 96Hepburn v Vannet 1997 SCCR 698 ... 91Hepper v HMA 1958 JC 39 .......... 86, 89,92, 97Hobbs v Tinling [1929] 2 KB 1 ........ 234Houston v Carnegie 1999 SCCR 604 .. 97Idaho v Wright, 497 US 805 (1990) . . 18,19, 23, 28, 149, 150, 242J (A M inor), Re [1984] Fam......
-
Table of Cases
...218,222, 224HL v Canada (Attorney-General) 2005 SCC 25 . 69HML vR [2008] HCA16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65Hobbs vTinling [1929] 2KB 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37Horncastle vR [2009] EWCACrim 964 . . 324–329Huber v Commonwealth 711 SW2d 490 (1986,Ky) . . . . . . . . . .......
-
Table of Cases
...(Alafin of Oyo) & Ors. v. Attorney General, Oyo State & Ors. (1984) 15 N.S.C.C. 397; (1984) 6 S.C. 135……...263 Hobbs v. Nottingham (1929) 2 K.B. 1 9........................................................535 Hoenig v. Isaacs (1952) 2 All E.R. 176……….......……………………..……291 Holman Bros. (Niger......
-
Dragged Through the Mud: Can Disincentives to Witness Participation in Criminal Trials be Removed?
...Evidence Act 2006, s 7. 11 Wi v R [2009] NZSC 121, [2010] 2 NZLR 11 at [8]. 12 R v Wood [2006] 3 NZLR 743 (CA) at [39]; Hobbs v Tinling [1929] 2 KB 1. 13 Evidence Act 2006, s 37. 14 Section 40. 15 Section 37. 16 Section 8(1)(a). 1. The collateral issues rule The collateral issues rule may a......
Get Started for Free