Hodgson v National and Local Government Officers Association

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1972
Year1972

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Lee Tak Suan v Tunku Dato' Seri Shahabudin Tunku Besar Burhanuddin
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2007
  • Francis George Hill Family Trust v South African Reserve Bank and Others
    • South Africa
    • 30 March 1992
    ...[1964] 1 WLR 843 (CA) at 851, 854; Hodgson and Others v National and Local Government Officers Association and Others [1971] ChD 130 ([1972] 1 All ER 15 (Ch)); East Pant Du Lead Mining Co v Merriweather (1864) 2 H&M 254 (13 WR 216; (1867) LR 5 E Eq 464); Daniels v Daniels [1978] Ch 406 ([19......
  • Xhcrx Peter H. Yip v Asian Electronics Ltd.
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 12 February 1998
    ...that is the rule that is to be maintained...." More recent cases such as Hodgson v. National‘Local Government Officers Association [1972] 1 All E.R. 15 at 22 F-J and Cane v. Jones [1981] 1 All E.R. 533 at 536 B-C have approved this 20. The irregularity principle really comes to this : the l......
  • Man Mei Kwai v Man Ping Nam
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 10 June 1999
    ...MacDougall v. Gardiner (1875) 1 Ch D 13 which was referred to in Hodgson v. National and Local Government Officers Association & Others [1972] 1 WLR 130 1) If every member of a company or association is allowed as an individual plaintiff to complain against a thing that is done in the cours......
  • Get Started for Free