Hodson v Pare
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1899 |
| Year | 1899 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
18 cases
-
Gall v Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited (No 2)
...out should be exercised only in plain and obvious cases, where no reasonable amendment could cure the alleged defect: cf Hodson v Pare [1899] 1 QB 455. (4) It goes without saying that if a substantial case is involved in the claim, the power to strike out cannot be (5) Where a point of law ......
-
Pigozzo v Mineral Resources Ltd
...Liq) [1916] HCA 81; (1916) 22 CLR 490 Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 H 1976 Nominees Pty Ltd v Galli (1979) 30 ALR 181 Hodson v Pare [1899] 1 QB 455 Hongkong Xinhe International Investment Co Ltd v Bullseye Mining Ltd (No 3) [2021] WASC 260 J & A Vaughan Super Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Becton P......
-
KTC v David
...out should be exercised only in plain and obvious cases, where no reasonable amendment could cure the alleged defect (cf Hodson v Pare ([1899] 1 QB 455)). (4) It goes without saying that if a substantial case is involved in the claim, the power to strike out cannot be (5) Where a point of l......
-
Kelly v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by Services Australia (formerly the Department of Human Services)
...240 Fair Work Ombudsman v Crocmedia Pty Ltd [2015] FCCA 140 Hall v A & A Sheiban Pty Ltd [1989] FCA 65; (1989) 85 ALR 503 Hodson v Pare [1899] 1 QB 455 Hollis v Vabu Pty Limited [2001] HCA 44; (2001) 207 CLR 21 Hope v Bathurst City Council [1980] HCA 16; (1980) 144 CLR 1 Huntlee Pty Ltd v S......
Get Started for Free