Holmes v Bradfield Rural District Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
| Year | 1949 |
| Date | 1949 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
21 cases
- Lim Yack Boon v Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Malaysia dan satu yang lain
- Ex P Multi-Purpose Finance Bhd; Re Tan Ah Poi
-
Jadi Investments Pte Ltd v Leong Siew Kwhy and Others
...and one leading to a result which is unjust or absurd, the court should choose the former. See, for example, Holmes v Bradfield RDC [1949] 2 KB 1 , at p 7 per Finnemore J. I cannot help thinking that if the arguments and the concerns which have been here expressed had been presented or cons......
-
Canada v. Canada North Group Inc.
...the legislature did not intend to lead to an absurdity, and will adopt the other interpretation”); Holmes v. Bradfield Rural District, [1949] 2 K.B. 1, 7 (“the mere fact that the results of applying a statute may be unjust or even absurd does not entitle this court to refuse to put it into ......
Get Started for Free
