Hoods-Barrs v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1946
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Hood Barrs v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 21 November 1946
    ...justify us troubling the House of Lords with it. [Solicitors:-J. de Meza & Co.; Solicitor of Inland Revenue.] 1 Reported (K.B. and C.A.) 176 L.T. 283. 1 Not included in the present 1 Not included in the present print. 1 25 T.C. 317. 2Ibid., at p. 331. 3 25 T.C. 430. 1 25 T.C. 430, at p. 441......
  • Yates (Inspector of Taxes) v Starkey
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ...be really based on the error against which Lord Greene, M.R. sounded a warning in the case ofHood Barrs v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, 176 L.T. 283, at page 291 (1). where he said: "Then Serjeant Sullivan formulated his proposition as to "the interpretation of such a clause as this interp......
  • Yates (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Starkey
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 5 March 1951
    ...be really based on the error against which Lord Greene, M.R. sounded a warning in the case ofHood Barrs v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, 176 L.T. 283, at page 291 (1). where he said: "Then Serjeant Sullivan formulated his proposition as to "the interpretation of such a clause as this interp......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT