Hornsey Urban Council v Hennell
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1902 |
Year | 1902 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
Rore Pat Stafford v Accident Compensation Corporation
...D W McMorland and others Land Law in New Zealand (online ed, LexisNexis) at [2.017]. 329 The Hornsey Urban District Council v Hennell [1902] 2 KB 73 (CA). 330 At 331 Courts are generally reluctant to extend the Crown's privileges further than is necessary. See Hogg, Monahan and Wright, abo......
-
Rore Pat Stafford v Accident Compensation Corporation
...land”. D W McMorland and others Land Law in New Zealand (online ed, LexisNexis) at [2.017]. The Hornsey Urban District Council v Hennell [1902] 2 KB 73 At 80. [322] I address below at [336]–[342] the question of whether the principle in Hennell applies to Crown burdens as well as benefits. ......
-
Tyne Improvement Commissioners v Armement Anversois S/A (The Brabo)
...and section 81 of the Act of 1934 itself. 57From such a conclusion, which is supported by abundant authority (I will refer only to Hornsey U.D.C. v. Hennell [1902] 2 K.B. 73, and the recent case of Province of Bombay v. Municipal Corporation of Bombay [1947] A.C. 58), the Appellants seek ......
-
Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council
...a well-settled proposition of law, and they need only refer, in addition to the cases already cited, to Hornsey Urban Council v. Hennell [1902] 2 K.B. 73 and Cooper v. Hawkins [1904] 2 K.B. 164. After full consideration their Lordships can find no reason to say that, by necessary implicatio......
Request a trial to view additional results