Horsey Estate Ltd v Steiger
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1899 |
Year | 1899 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Charlotte Abigail Reiner v Triplark Ltd
... ... But there clearly is a distinction, as this court said in Horsey Estate Ltd v Steiger [1899] QB 79 ... In that case, an agreement for the sale of leasehold ... ...
-
O'Regan v White
...731. (4) 15 Vesey, 238. (5) 2 T. R. 133 at p. 140. (1) 4 L. R. Ir. 438. (2) 15 Ves. 265. (3) 12 Ves. 504. (1) [1900] 2 Q. B. 267. (1) [1899] 2 Q. B. 79. (1) [1900] 2 Q. B. 267. (2) [1899] 2 Q. B. at p. 92. (3) 8 I. Ch. R. 37. (1) 8 I. Ch. R. 38, note. (2) 8 I. Ch. R. 37. (1) I. R. 7 C. L. 4......
-
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding (A.P.).
...law for a negative answer was sought to be drawn from two cases between landlord and tenant— Stevens v. Copp 1868 L.R.4 Ex. 20, Horsey Estate, Ltd. v. Steiger [1899] 2 Q.B. 79. Neither of these cases gives me satisfaction but it is not necessary to disagree with them since they do not appl......
-
Smith v Spaul
...the assignment was in breach of covenant. There was privity of estate between the lessor and assignee. In Horsey Estate Ltd v Steiger [1899] 2 QB 79, at 91, Lord Russell of Killowen CJ held that the purpose of a section 146 notice is "to give the person whose interest it is sought to forfei......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1963
...and Anor. (1961) 1 All E.R. 74. 145 Holman v. Johnson (1775) Cowp. 341 (98 Eng. R. 1120). 55 Horsey Estate Ltd. v. Steiger (1899) 2 Q.B. 79, 92. 83 Hunt v. Luck (1901) 1 Ch. 45; (1902) 1 Ch.428 C.A. 102 In re W. (Infants) (1956) 1 Ch. 384. 241 lnneh v. AruegLon (1952) 14 WA CA 73 164 Jackso......
-
Table of Cases
...[2000] 2 WLR 1396, [2000] 2 All ER 705, CA 89–90 Holmes v Buckley (1691) Prec Ch 39, 24 ER 20, Ct of Ch 81–82 Horsey Estate Ltd v Steiger [1899] 2 QB 79, 68 LJQB 743, [1895–9] All ER Rep 515, CA 50 Hotchkys, Re; Freke v Calmady (1886) 32 Ch D 408, 55 LJ Ch 546, 34 WR 569, CA 185 Hyde v Ward......
-
Right of Re-entry
...Stevens v Copp (1868) LR 4 Exch 20 (covenant not to be convicted of a breach of the Game Laws did not run); Horsey Estate Ltd v Steiger [1899] 2 QB 79 (covenant not to go into liquidation did run). 11 [1973] AC 691 at 718. whether to exercise it on similar principles to those which apply to......