Hough v London Express Newspaper Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
64 cases
  • Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 February 1970
    ...30 The only cases, of which know, which are inconsistent with this principle are Cassidy v. Daily Mirror. ( 1929 2 K. B. 331); and Hough v. London Express, ( 1940 2 K. B. 507), which followed it. In Cassidy's. Case, the Daily Mirror published a photograph of "Mr. Cassidy, the racehor......
  • Murugason v The Straits Times Press (1975) Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 February 1984
    ...1 WLR 822; [1981] 2 All ER 272 (folld) Grubb v Bristol United Press Ltd [1963] 1 QB 309 (folld) Hough v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1940] 2 KB 507 (folld) Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234 (folld) Rules of the Supreme Court 1970, TheO 78r 3 (1) Tort–Defamation–Libel–Lawyer present......
  • DHKW Marketing and Another v Nature's Farm Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 2 November 1998
    ...the defamatory sense without proving that any person did in fact understand them in that sense. See Hough v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1940] 2 KB 507. Also as Gatley states in the passage cited at para 18 above, where the words refer to a class, the question is whether a reasonable reade......
  • Datuk Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim v Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2013
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT