Hough v London Express Newspaper Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1940 |
| Year | 1940 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
77 cases
-
Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd
...know, which are inconsistent with this principle are Cassidy v. Daily Mirror. ( 1929 2 K. B. 331); and Hough v. London Express, ( 1940 2 K. B. 507), which followed it. In Cassidy's. Case, the Daily Mirror published a photograph of "Mr. Cassidy, the racehorse owner, and Miss X whose engageme......
-
Murugason v The Straits Times Press (1975) Ltd
... ... published by the defendants in the issue of The Straits Times newspaper of 22 January 1981.The facts are these. The plaintiff is and was at all ... on Defamation (1978), pp 17, 18, 19, 20, paras 4.17 to 4.22.In Hough v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1940] 507, 513, 515 Slesser LJ said: ... ...
-
DHKW Marketing and Another v Nature's Farm Pte Ltd
...the defamatory sense without proving that any person did in fact understand them in that sense. See Hough v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1940] 2 KB 507. Also as Gatley states in the passage cited at para 18 above, where the words refer to a class, the question is whether a reasonable reade......
- Janet Jagan and Another v Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Courts 2
...meaning of the words complained of. See The Sketch Publishing Co. Ltd. v. Alhaji Ajagbemokeferi (supra) and Hough v. London Express (1940) 2 K.B. 507 at 515. I have drawn the inference from the words complained of and came to the conclusion that the words in Exhibit P.15 were not defamatory......
-
Identification of the Plaintiff
...Reid at 1162c (H.L.), citing Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspapers, [1929] 2 K.B. 311 (C.A.) and Hough v. London Express Newspaper Ltd., [1940] 2 K.B. 507: I ... reject the argument that the appellant must fail because the respondents article contained no pointer or peg for his identification.......
-
Defamatory Meaning
...ascribed to that expression. VanderZalm v. Times Publishers, [1980] 4 WWR. 259 (B.C.C.A.). Hough v. London Express Newspapers Ltd., [1940] 2 K.B. 507 at 51315 (C.A.). However, in establishing the legal innuendo, the plaintiff is not entitled to introduce facts which were unknown to the pers......
-
Cases referred to in 1956
...Trade (1913) 3 K.B. 507, 535. 10 Holmes v The Director of Public Prosecutions. 31- C.A.R. 126 29 Hough v. London Express Newspaper Ltd. (1940) 2 K.B. 507, 515 10 In Re Robinson, Clarkson v Robinson (1911) 1 Ch.230 23 In re Sarah I Adadevoh and others, 13 W.A.C.A. 304. 18 In re William Davie......
Get Started for Free